- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 16:04:08 +0100
- To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
Reminder: SPARQL/RDF WGs Coordination on Graph Terminology Please add yourself soon so we can close the poll. The current top dates are rather split: Wed 22 / Wed 6 / Wed 13 15:00 London, 16:00 Amsterdam, 10:00 Boston, 07:00 San Francisco Andy On 13/06/11 21:19, Andy Seaborne wrote: > > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Re: SPARQL/RDF WGs Coordination on Graph Terminology > Resent-Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 19:29:50 +0000 > Resent-From: public-rdf-wg@w3.org > Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 20:27:38 +0100 > From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com> > To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org > > > > On 13/06/11 19:27, David Wood wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Lee suggested [1] that the RDF WG should look carefully at graph >> terminology being adopted by the SPARQL WG. This message suggests a >> telecon among interested parties to align graph terminology between >> the working groups. >> >> We can meet directly before the RDF telecon time on Wednesdays at >> 10:00 US EST, or at another time if you care to suggest. > > Good time slot for me - although preferably not this week (not a blocker). > > 22nd June? > > I put on a Doodle poll for the next few Wednesdays: > > http://www.doodle.com/iny935vc6n67vxpv > > Andy > >> >> Please note that this completes Guus' action [2], which I think should >> have been given to me. >> >> Regards, >> Dave >> >> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2011May/0192.html >> [2] http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/actions/58 >> >> >> > >
Received on Sunday, 19 June 2011 15:04:44 UTC