- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 21:19:22 +0100
- To: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
-------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: SPARQL/RDF WGs Coordination on Graph Terminology Resent-Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 19:29:50 +0000 Resent-From: public-rdf-wg@w3.org Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 20:27:38 +0100 From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com> To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org On 13/06/11 19:27, David Wood wrote: > Hi all, > > Lee suggested [1] that the RDF WG should look carefully at graph terminology being adopted by the SPARQL WG. This message suggests a telecon among interested parties to align graph terminology between the working groups. > > We can meet directly before the RDF telecon time on Wednesdays at 10:00 US EST, or at another time if you care to suggest. Good time slot for me - although preferably not this week (not a blocker). 22nd June? I put on a Doodle poll for the next few Wednesdays: http://www.doodle.com/iny935vc6n67vxpv Andy > > Please note that this completes Guus' action [2], which I think should have been given to me. > > Regards, > Dave > > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2011May/0192.html > [2] http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/actions/58 > > >
Received on Monday, 13 June 2011 20:19:55 UTC