- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2011 15:45:45 +0100
- To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
On 01/06/11 14:59, Lee Feigenbaum wrote: > We implement this in Anzo. It's very useful. > > But, we don't have the bandwidth to produce a new recommendation. I > can't in good conscience support this work at this time. > > Lee I'll do it. http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/csv-tsv-results/results-csv-tsv.html We can at least do a NOTE but for this, given deployed experience, the additional REC cost is lower than it might otherwise be. Testing is one such cost but we have to do JSON results testing so adding a parallel .csv and .tsv versions would be enough and there are already tools to produce the formats. There is no need for content type registration if we go with existing content types. There are text/csv and text/tab-separated-values. :-) Andy
Received on Wednesday, 1 June 2011 14:46:16 UTC