- From: Alexandre Passant <Alexandre.Passant@deri.org>
- Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 08:00:49 +0100
- To: Paul Gearon <pgearon@revelytix.com>
- Cc: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>, SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
I'm OK with the changes for MS answer, I've just sent it Alex. On 4 May 2011, at 01:07, Paul Gearon wrote: > I have checked through each of these and am mostly happy with the responses. > > I have added a line to ST-1 indicating that while we do not fully > support the functionality of a DROP/WHERE operation, we will not be > adding it in this version. > > I will send out HK-2, ST-1, and RN-1, as they were originally written > by me. Alex, can you send MS-1 please? > > Also, this is to confirm as per ACTION-453 that there are no LC > blocking issues in these comments > > Regards, > Paul Gearon > > On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 7:13 PM, Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org> wrote: >> I re-checked outstanding Update comments, as detailed below. >> >> Some of the response drafts were lying around a bit too long, so I updated them to the latest status >> and would encourage replies to this email approving to send the responses out (we really should get >> those responses out of the way, before the LC comments come in). >> >> best, >> Axel >> >> 1) http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:RN-1 >> >> I modified the answer about blank nodes in DELETE templates, as we finally went for forbidding them, >> and modified the answer about LOAD SILENT, which we now allow >> also I added some few explaining words here and there. >> >> 2) http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:ST-1 >> >> I did only some minor rewording, but I am good with that response to be sent off. >> >> 3) http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:MS-1 >> >> I changed mainly: >> >> 'We will clarify that in the SPARQL 1.1 Update document, in section 2.2. >> >> "SPARQL 1.1 Update operation are non-recursive, which means that the resulting (inserted) triples are not matched at a later stage in the query patterns" >> ' >> since that sentence is no longer in the spec. Rather, I changed this to: >> >> ' >> The new section "4 SPARQL Update Formal Model" in the SPARQL 1.1 Update document (see http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/update-1.1/#formalModel for the current Editor's draft) shall clarify this behaviour. >> ' >> >> 4) http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:HK-2 >> >> Also added a hint to the new formal model and added a note that we moved the INSERT and DELETE sections into subsections of INSERT/DELETE >> >> >> >>
Received on Wednesday, 4 May 2011 07:01:17 UTC