- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2011 12:11:35 +0100
- To: Birte Glimm <birte.glimm@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
- CC: Olivier Corby <olivier.corby@inria.fr>, SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
I can't even parse the queries: ==rdf01.rq Line 4, column 11: Unresolved prefixed name: rdf:Property ==rdf02.rq Line 4, column 6: Unresolved prefixed name: rdf:type Andy On 06/04/11 19:00, Birte Glimm wrote: > On 6 April 2011 10:54, Olivier Corby<olivier.corby@inria.fr> wrote: >> Hi Birte, >> >> I pass all the entailment test cases with success now ! >> There were just a "." missing in rdfs03.ttl and rdfs04.ttl and the @base >> were still present in manifest.ttl, I corrected these typos. > > That's great. Sorry for the stupid missing dots. I probably should run > ARQ on them since I have it insalled anyway to at least make sure they > parse properly. Not sure whether or how I can get ARQ to do > materialization/entailment. Since my implementation is only doing OWL > Direct Semantics, I don't even attempt to read the other tests > normaly. > > Cheers, > Birte > >> Best regards, >> >> Olivier >> >> >> > > >
Received on Thursday, 7 April 2011 11:12:21 UTC