- From: Birte Glimm <birte.glimm@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2011 15:19:08 +0100
- To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Cc: Olivier Corby <olivier.corby@inria.fr>, SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Sorry, I fixed that now. If I keep making so many mistakes, I won't be allowed to write any more test cases (that's my hope at least ;-) ) Birte On 7 April 2011 12:11, Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com> wrote: > I can't even parse the queries: > > ==rdf01.rq > Line 4, column 11: Unresolved prefixed name: rdf:Property > ==rdf02.rq > Line 4, column 6: Unresolved prefixed name: rdf:type > > Andy > > On 06/04/11 19:00, Birte Glimm wrote: >> >> On 6 April 2011 10:54, Olivier Corby<olivier.corby@inria.fr> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Birte, >>> >>> I pass all the entailment test cases with success now ! >>> There were just a "." missing in rdfs03.ttl and rdfs04.ttl and the @base >>> were still present in manifest.ttl, I corrected these typos. >> >> That's great. Sorry for the stupid missing dots. I probably should run >> ARQ on them since I have it insalled anyway to at least make sure they >> parse properly. Not sure whether or how I can get ARQ to do >> materialization/entailment. Since my implementation is only doing OWL >> Direct Semantics, I don't even attempt to read the other tests >> normaly. >> >> Cheers, >> Birte >> >>> Best regards, >>> >>> Olivier >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> > -- Dr. Birte Glimm, Room 309 Computing Laboratory Parks Road Oxford OX1 3QD United Kingdom +44 (0)1865 283520
Received on Friday, 8 April 2011 14:19:41 UTC