Re: Another thing on property paths...

On 17/12/10 12:14, Axel Polleres wrote:
> On 17 Dec 2010, at 10:54, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>> What changes to
>> are you proposing?
> Do I understand correctly, that the current definition does exactly what I propose? :-)

I am asking you what changes would be necessary.

We need to work in a mode where all comments/issues are related to the 
document.  The starting point is the text that is currently there.


Received on Friday, 17 December 2010 13:24:29 UTC