- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2010 14:50:42 +0000
- To: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
- CC: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On 25/11/10 10:40, Steve Harris wrote: .. > The fact that POST updates are not yet fully specified in http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-http-rdf-update/#http-post is a source of concern to us. > > - Steve Could you say what isn't specified and should be? Currently I use the Content-type to get the syntax, the body is the payload and payload = RDF document from earlier in the spec. I return 200 if the target existed, and 201 if it didn't which is my (limited) understand of correct status codes for HTTP. Andy
Received on Thursday, 25 November 2010 14:51:15 UTC