Re: Comments GK-1 and 2

The response to GK-3 looks fine to me.

- Steve

On 2010-10-14, at 10:57, Axel Polleres wrote:

> Hi steve,
> 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2010Oct/0000.html
> is GK-3 and I drafted a response to it (not yet sent)
> 
> I agree that we can ignore GK-1, and probably also GK-2.
> Am not entirely clear what you mean by GK-2 should be linked to GK-3?
> You mean, just on the comments page, put them in the same line?
> 
> Apart fro mthat, are youok with the reply to GK-3 (then I'll send it, was just wating for a second approval, Andy gave ok already)
> 
> Axel
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 12 Oct 2010, at 12:59, Steve Harris wrote:
> 
>> GK-1 is http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2010Sep/0000.html, but
>> GK-2 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2010Oct/0001.html
>> Says to ignore GK-1.
>> 
>> Do they still require a formal response? Seems a bit excessive.
>> 
>> I suspect that GK-1 should be ignored, and GK-2 should be linked to
>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2010Oct/0000.html
>> 
>> - Steve
>> 
>> --
>> Steve Harris, CTO, Garlik Limited
>> 1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW, UK
>> +44 20 8439 8203  http://www.garlik.com/
>> Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11
>> Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10 9AD
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 

-- 
Steve Harris, CTO, Garlik Limited
1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW, UK
+44 20 8439 8203  http://www.garlik.com/
Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11
Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10 9AD

Received on Thursday, 14 October 2010 10:34:46 UTC