- From: Graham Klyne <graham.klyne@zoo.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 09:56:42 +0100
- To: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
With reference to http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-sparql11-query-20100601/#optionals http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/query-1.1/rq25.xml#optionals I think it would be helpful to add some explanation that P OPTIONAL Q and P { OPTIONAL Q } can yield different results. I recognize that to some extent this request challenges the philosophy of what a specification is _for_, and accept that the first purpose of a specification is to specify, but I also think that some level of explanation helps to ensure the specification is properly followed. In this case, both myself and at least one other experienced developer had not expected there to be a difference. For my own benefit, I've created an explanation based on elements of the query algebra which you are welcome to copy and/or adapt if that is helpful: http://code.google.com/p/milarq/wiki/OutstandingIssues#OPTIONAL_in_braces_doesn't_work_as_might_be_expected #g
Received on Friday, 1 October 2010 08:57:41 UTC