Re: Agenda TC 2010-10-05

W.r.t BIND/LET syntax, I would like to propose some syntax like BIND(?x + ?y AS ?z), as I think this has more in common with the rest of SPARQL. As far as I know that syntax is not used by any current system either, so there should be fewer issues with proprietary extensions and SPARQL 1.1, around subtle semantic differences.  

- Steve

On 4 Oct 2010, at 12:10, Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org> wrote:

> Agenda is up on the usual place at
> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Agenda-2010-10-05
> roughly, besides continuing through the publications, I tried to order the other open points by priority...
> 1) get back to BIND/LET
> 2) new public comments we need to assign 
> 3) duplicate groups discussion on the mailinglist (anything we need to discuss here in the call?)
> 
> in one of the next confs we should probably get back to test cases.
> 
> full agenda below,
> 
> Axel
> 
> 
> ============
> 
> Call in details
> 
> 
> When joining please don't identify yourself verbally; instead, identify yourself to Zakim on IRC
> 
>  • Date of Call: Tuesday October 05, 2010
>  • Time of Call: 15:00 UK, 10:00 (East US)
>  • Dial-In #: +1.617.761.6200 (Cambridge, MA)
>  • Dial-In #: +33.4.26.46.79.03 (France)
>  • Dial-In #: +44.203.318.0479 (UK)
>  • Participant Access Code: 77277# (SPARQ)
>  • IRC Channel: irc.w3.org port 6665 channel #sparql ([irc:irc.w3.org:6665/sparql])
>  • Web-based IRC (member-only): http://www.w3.org/2001/01/cgi-irc (Firefox IRC addon: chatzilla)
>  • Duration: 60 minutes
>  • Chair: Lee Feigenbaum
>  • Scribe: Matt Perry (Scribe List)
>  • Link to Agenda: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Agenda-2010-10-05
> [edit] Agenda
> 
>  • Admin (10min)
>   • PROPOSED: Approve minutes at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2010-09-28
>   • Next regular meeting: 2010-10-12 @ 15:00 UK / 10:00 EDT (scribe: Axel Polleres )
>   • charter extension/schedule
>  • Working Draft publication
>   • Query http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/query-1.1/ (are parts ready for review?)
>    • Greg's review: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JulSep/0422.html and Andy's summary: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JulSep/0459.html
>    • Matt's review: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JulSep/0437.html
>   • Update http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/update-1.1/
>    • See Axel's review - http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JulSep/0492.html
>    • (we need more reviews)
>   • Entailment http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/entailment/
>    • See Olivier's review and follow-up - http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JulSep/0426.html
>    • See Ivan's comments - http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010OctDec/0003.html
>   • HTTP-RDF-update http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/http-rdf-update/
>   • Service Description http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/service-description-1.1/
>    • See Alex's review - http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JulSep/0425.html
>    • See Birte's review - http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JulSep/0419.html
>   • Testsuite http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/
>  • get back to LET/BIND/assignment
>  • new comments, see http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Comments
>  • dublicate groups, see Andy's mail and follow-up http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JulSep/0485.html
>  • next time: get back to test cases?
> 
>

Received on Monday, 4 October 2010 12:20:26 UTC