- From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 08:38:57 +0000
- To: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>, SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
> * Action/issue status - via tracker: > http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/ My outstanding action to draft something for rdf:text is done. The LC period is minimal length and ends May 12 so we have today's telecom, F2F time (the next telecon is 12 earliest). Changes suggested for rdf:text: 1/ State that rdf:text MUST NOT appear in SPARQL Query Results. 2/ Use the extension mechanism of sec 12.6 (NB can lead to mixed entailment regimes in one query so potentailly leaking rdf:text from one graph matching to another). Just stopping rdf:text getting out of a matched graph seems draconian (and blocks SPARQL/OWL). Don't know what the best thing to do about the impact on functions STR/LANG/DATATYPE. Also the effect on deployed code that assumes a literal has either a lang tag or a datatype but not both (as SteveH notes). Andy
Received on Tuesday, 28 April 2009 08:40:32 UTC