- From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
- Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 11:51:05 -0400
- To: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Hi everyone, Here's our agenda for tomorrow. Note that I've asked for us to try to give 90 minutes tomorrow to best prepare for our face-to-face next week. Besides discussing the face-to-face, our main goals are to see if we have consensus on a few SPARQL features, and also to allow people who have been strong proponents of issues that do not seem to have broad support to advocate for them once again. Note that we may be making proposals/resolutions around adopting some deliverables tomorrow, so if you will not be attending the teleconference and have strong feeling on the (current) top features, please let them be known via email. talk to you all tomorrow, Lee See: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Agenda-2009-04-28 * Date of Call: Tuesday April 28, 2009 * Time of Call: 15:00 UK, 10:00 (East US) * Dial-In #: +1.617.761.6200 (Cambridge, MA) * Dial-In #: +33.4.89.06.34.99 (Nice, France) * Dial-In #: +44.117.370.6152 (Bristol, UK) * Participant Access Code: 77277# (SPARQ) * IRC Channel: irc.w3.org port 6665 channel #sparql ([irc:irc.w3.org:6665/sparql]) * Web-based IRC (member-only): http://www.w3.org/2001/01/cgi-irc (Firefox IRC addon: chatzilla) * Duration: 90 minutes * Chair: Lee Feigenbaum * Scribe: Ivan Mikhailov (Scribe List) * Link to Agenda: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Agenda-2009-04-28 [edit] Agenda Note 90 minute duration. * Admin o PROPOSED: Approve minutes at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2009-04-21 o Next meeting: 2009-05-05 @ 15:00 BST / 10:00 EDT ? Do we skip telecon the day before F2F? * Logistics o Scribe next time: Chimezie Ogbuji (Scribe List) * Liaisons o Anything to report? o OWL WG (Bijan) o HCLS (Eric) o XQuery (Eric) o RIF WG (Axel) o RDB2RDF WG (Orri) * Action/issue status - via tracker: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/ * Face-to-face next week o Confirm attendees o Logistics questions? + Timing o Agenda + Suggested agenda: # 0.5 day discussing features # 0.5 day discussing feature 1 # 0.5 day discussing feature 2 # 0.5 day discussing feature 3 + Suggested discussion points: # Naming (SPARQL 1.1 vs. SPARQL 2 vs. ???) # Survey of existing designs # Straw man designs # Test cases * Feature Survey http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35463/features/ o Survey open until Friday, May 1 o Current results are at http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35463/features/results o See Condorcet results from SteveH at http://plugin.org.uk/misc/votes.svg o Can we reach consensus on a few features? Current front-runners per Condorcet are: + Aggreagtes + Subselects + Update o Discussion around features with strong advocacy that seem "at risk" + SPARQL/OWL (Bijan) + LimitPerResource (Kjetil, Alex) + ParameterizedInference (Chime) + AccessingRdfLists (EricP) + SPARQLX (Bijan) + Others? [edit] Regrets * Orri Erling
Received on Monday, 27 April 2009 15:51:52 UTC