rdf:text review

Dear all,

I would like to encourage everybody who has comments on it to read 
Andy's rdf:text review, such that we can put it forward to OWL+RIF.

Unless severe additional new comments or concerns come up, I'd like to 
propose to put it forward "as is" as official review of from the SPARQL 
WG to get the process of fixing the concerns going, ideally after 
today's telecon or at least after the F2F (in case we can't agree 
quickly today, we should have some discussion about it at the f2f).

The resason for pushing this is that rdf:text should ideally enter CR 
with the rest of the OWL documents in June, which is why 
</sparql><rif>we</rif><sparql> want all concerns addressed as soon as 
possible.

best regards,
Axel

-- 
Dr. Axel Polleres
Digital Enterprise Research Institute, National University of Ireland, 
Galway
email: axel.polleres@deri.org  url: http://www.polleres.net/

Received on Tuesday, 28 April 2009 08:37:38 UTC