- From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 12:07:58 +0100
- To: DAWG public list <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
- CC: Virginie Bottollier <Virginie.Bottollier@sophia.inria.fr>
bNodes in the predicate position are no longer legal so the syntax tests are wrong (I thought we'd noted this when we resolved that matter). Thanks to Virginie for reporting these. Andy Steve Harris wrote: > Hi All, > > I got this query, I remember discussing it, but I dont remember what the > WGs decision was, but the validator at > http://www.sparql.org/validator.html does certainly reject the two > approved tests. > > - Steve > > ----- Forwarded message from Virginie Bottollier <Virginie.Bottollier@sophia.inria.fr> ----- > >> Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2006 10:07:27 +0200 >> From: Virginie Bottollier <Virginie.Bottollier@sophia.inria.fr> >> Subject: SPARQL syntax >> To: Steve Harris <S.W.Harris@ecs.soton.ac.uk> >> >> Dear Mr Harris >> >> I looked at the tests for SPARQL in the tests page >> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/ and tried to run the tests >> on Corese (The "Conceptual Resource Search Engine" we are working on; >> see http://www-sop.inria.fr/acacia/corese/ if you want to know more). >> I have noticed 2 tests, marked as approved, but I think not correct with >> the syntax: >> <http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data/SyntaxFull/syntax-bnodes-03.rq> >> >> and >> <http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data/SyntaxFull/syntax-bnodes-04.rq> >> >> Can we have a blank node at the property place? Perhaps I just >> misunderstood the grammar, if this is the case please tell me. >> Thanks for your answer. >> >> Virginie BOTTOLLIER >> > > ----- End forwarded message ----- >
Received on Monday, 10 April 2006 11:08:18 UTC