- From: Steve Harris <S.W.Harris@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 09:37:36 +0100
- To: DAWG public list <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Hi All, I got this query, I remember discussing it, but I dont remember what the WGs decision was, but the validator at http://www.sparql.org/validator.html does certainly reject the two approved tests. - Steve ----- Forwarded message from Virginie Bottollier <Virginie.Bottollier@sophia.inria.fr> ----- > Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2006 10:07:27 +0200 > From: Virginie Bottollier <Virginie.Bottollier@sophia.inria.fr> > Subject: SPARQL syntax > To: Steve Harris <S.W.Harris@ecs.soton.ac.uk> > > Dear Mr Harris > > I looked at the tests for SPARQL in the tests page > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/ and tried to run the tests > on Corese (The "Conceptual Resource Search Engine" we are working on; > see http://www-sop.inria.fr/acacia/corese/ if you want to know more). > I have noticed 2 tests, marked as approved, but I think not correct with > the syntax: > <http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data/SyntaxFull/syntax-bnodes-03.rq> > > and > <http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data/SyntaxFull/syntax-bnodes-04.rq> > > Can we have a blank node at the property place? Perhaps I just > misunderstood the grammar, if this is the case please tell me. > Thanks for your answer. > > Virginie BOTTOLLIER > ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Stephen Harris 07970 557047 AKT, IAM Research Group 023 8059 8347 University of Southampton, UK swh@ecs.soton.ac.uk http://www.aktors.org/
Received on Thursday, 6 April 2006 08:38:02 UTC