agenda: RDF Data Access 2 Aug

1. Convene, take roll, review records and agenda

  http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/
  2005-08-02T14:30Z

  tel:+1.617.761.6200 code:7333
  supplementary IRC chat:irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg
    log to appear:http://www.w3.org/2005/08/02-dawg-irc

scribe: AndyS

  record for review:http://www.w3.org/2005/07/26-dawg-minutes

next meeting: 9 Aug
 scribe volunteer?

continue the following without discussion:

ACTION: ericP to add "don't normalize" to rq23 (perhaps supplied in
0096)
ACTION: EricP to add test in 0096 to rq23 tests. label "approved" and
ref http://www.w3.org/2005/07/26-dawg-minutes
ACTION: ericP to send [OK?] message to Bjoern

ACTION: ericP to update rq23 to include the text of rq23/mime.txt
reflect security concearns

ACTION: DanC to follow up re optional test based on op:dateTime triple 
ACTION: DaveB to to propose source test to approve
ACTION: SteveH to review the relevant test case re: IRI normalization
ref http://www.w3.org/2005/06/28-dawg-minutes#item06
ACTION: AndyS to add the above graph test cases (analagous to
valueTesting test cases) (don't expect quick delivery) ref
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ftf5-bos.html#item05

comments on agenda?


2. ISSUE resultsMimeType

DONE: DaveB to add mime type to results format
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JulSep/0125.html
DONE: EliasT to review XML Results mime-type registration
"I've read the entire draft to be sent to the IETF and it looks good."
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JulSep/0126.html
DONE: DanC to review XML Results mime-type registration
"1.55 looks good The changes in 1.56 and 1.57 look OK"
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JulSep/0140.html

DONE: KendallC to update protocol spec w.r.t. results mime type
DONE: KendallC to Check whether the results namespace is in protocol
draft; if so, update.
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/proto-wd/ 1.53  2005/07/27 19:42:14

DONE: AndyS to fix rq23 to reflect new results namespace
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/ 1.448  2005/08/01 13:20:06


DONE: DaveB to update rf1 with new namespace
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rf1/

ACTION: DaveB respond to "sparqlResults namespace" comment
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2005Jul/0039.html , after rq23 is updated

Note new "[OK?]" convention.


3. SPARQL results publication

DONE: DaveB to choose a term and define it
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rf1/#defn-srd

DONE: EricP to ask for namespace approval and put a document there
http://www.w3.org/2005/sparql-results 1.4

ACTION: ericP to publish rf1


4. toward Protocol last call

DONE: KendallC to use Dave's name for a results set doc in the protocol
draft...
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/proto-wd/ 1.53

DONE: KendallC to consider flattening rdf-dataset

DONE: KendallC to add security considerations section to proto draft,
under 4. Policy...

security considerations could use some eyeballs.

DONE: KendallC to add POST binding to protocol doc
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/proto-wd/ 1.53

post binding could use some eyeballs... and tests (hmm...).

Is 1.55 a last call candidate? I see some todos, but
they all seem to be to provide examples. Can I get
a couple reviewers?

Hmm... testing framework? at least a mental experiment
framework, if not bits...


5. SPARQL QL comment status and editorial comments

I may play a game of "Zakim, pick a victim" for comments
that we haven't done anything with...
  http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/lc-status-report.html

ACTION: DanC to investigate having CVS commits send to the WG list


6. issue valueTesting

DONE EricP/Andy: revise rq23 to remove reference to
implementations/engines

ACTION: EricP to finish extendedType-eq-pass-result.n3

"I propose that
ValueTesting/extendedType-eq-pass-result.n3 is correct and that the
WG approve it as a SPARQL test."
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JulSep/0157.html

Last call comments:

 Error handling
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2005Jul/0032.html

and

 language tag issues
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2005Jul/0031


7. issue badIRIRef

http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#badIRIRef

comments QuotedIRIref too lax and IRIs vs RDF URI References

WG discussion
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JulSep/thread.html#153


8. comment "Query forms should be resources, not operations"
http://www.w3.org/mid/20050728190012.GE18852@markbaker.ca

Hmm...


9. Test cases publication

ACTION: DanC to check after August on SteveH regarding test preparation
for publication as WG Note

Other folks interested to do something sooner?



      [      tlt:localTime  (
            "Amsterdam"
            "Tue 4:30 PM"  ),
                     (
            "Brussels"
            "Tue 4:30 PM"  ),
                     (
            "Chicago"
            "Tue 9:30 AM"  ),
                     (
            "Helsinki"
            "Tue 5:30 PM"  ),
                     (
            "London"
            "Tue 3:30 PM"  ),
                     (
            "New York"
            "Tue 10:30 AM"  ),
                     (
            "Rome"
            "Tue 4:30 PM"  ),
                     (
            "Tokyo"
            "Tue 11:30 PM"  ),
                     (
            "Vancouver"
            "Tue 7:30 AM"  );
             tlt:startTimePage
<http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=02&month=08&year=2005&hour=14&min=30&sec=0>;
             cal:dtstart  [
                 cal:dateTime "2005-08-02T14:30Z" ] ].

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E

Received on Monday, 1 August 2005 18:28:10 UTC