- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 09 May 2005 19:51:27 -0500
- To: kendall@monkeyfist.com
- Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Mon, 2005-05-09 at 19:58 -0400, Kendall Clark wrote: > On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 02:03:15PM -0500, Dan Connolly wrote: > > > So the protocol spec should import the term "SPARQL query" from > > the QL spec; i.e. hypertext link directly to it. It's probably > > worth declaring a subtype of xs:string for it too. > > I assume by subtype you mean a restriction; the only facet that seems > relevant is pattern, which only takes (afaict) a regex. I don't think > that will work here? I was thinking of just naming the type without really expressing the constraints in a formal way; just using some xs:annotation/documentation to say "this has to be in SPARQL syntax" with a hyperlink. > > "A SPARQL query is a sequence of characters that correspond > > to a sequence of tokens that is in the language > > defined by the grammar below." > > I'll hyperlink directly to rq23 when it contains a definition that's > stable! :> > > > The lexical details could be more explicit; we need to > > be clear how character sequences correspond to token > > sequences; perhaps what's there is clear enough. > > It might be nice to list all the tokens, or > > token types, for example. > > I assume this is a comment for rq23? yes. > Kendall Clark -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Tuesday, 10 May 2005 00:51:31 UTC