- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 15:40:33 -0500
- To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
- Cc: Jeen Broekstra <jeen@aduna.biz>
hypertext version: http://www.w3.org/2005/04/05-dawg-minutes.html plaintext snapshot follows: [1]W3C . [2]DAWG [1] http://www.w3.org/ [2] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess RDF Data Access Weekly Teleconference 5 Apr 2005 See also: [3]IRC log, [4]proposed agenda [3] http://www.w3.org/2005/04/05-dawg-irc [4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005AprJun/0004.html Attendees Present Yoshio, DanC, Kevin, HowardK, PatH, DaveB, Kendall_Clark, JosD, SteveH Jeen Broekstra (sender of comments such as [5]more on optionals) participated as an observer. [5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2005Feb/0021.html Regrets AndyS, EricP, BryanT Chair DanC Scribe KendallC Contents * [6]Topics 1. [7]Convene, take roll, review records and agenda 2. [8]issue: valueTesting 3. [9]issue: sort 4. [10]punctuationSyntax 5. [11]SPARQL QL publication candidate 6. [12]issue wsdlAbstractProtocol 7. [13]SPARQL Variable Results format 8. [14]Test Suite Maintenance _________________________________________________________________ Convene, take roll, review records and agenda <kendall> [15]minutes approved from last week's meeting [15] http://www.w3.org/2005/03/29-dawg-minutes.html next meeting 12 Apr, DaveB to scribe, risks noted continued without (much) discussion: <scribe> ACTION: KendallC to work out remaining details in sparqlx.{rnc,xsd,rng}: expression syntax, order-by stuff continues [recorded in [16]http://www.w3.org/2005/04/05-dawg-minutes.html#action08] <scribe> ACTION: [PENDING] KendallC to incorporate EricP's privacy text, salting to taste [recorded in [17]http://www.w3.org/2005/04/05-dawg-minutes.html#action15] issue: valueTesting <scribe> [DONE] ACTION EricP: to propose to close valueTesting (bonus points for test cases, to EricP or others) -> [18]11th hour datatype testing proposal [18] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005AprJun/0015.html <kendall> some discussion of some of ericp valuetesting tests... <DaveB> looking at [19]SPARQL-DT-1-alg.sh [19] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/perl/modules/W3C/Rdf/test/SPARQL-DT-1-alg.sh?rev=HEAD&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup <kendall> HowardK been following along a bit on Eric's design <kendall> (discussion of eric's sparql-dt-0) <kendall> XQuery makes 42 int and 42 float True (I think? It promotes the int to float, apparently) <SteveH> I think this test says that xsd:int(42.0) = 42 is true <kendall> discussion of 11.1.1 of rq23 <DaveB> it's refering to [20]http://www.w3.org/TR/xquery/#mapping [20] http://www.w3.org/TR/xquery/#mapping <Zakim> Yoshio, you wanted to ask if a != b is True if no assertion on a being equal to b or not is provided <Yoshio> re: Eric's design, a != b should be True <Yoshio> following fron link on "!" leads to XQuery fn:not, which would say so <Zakim> DanC, you wanted to give the "datatype swamp" speech again <kendall> danc tries to recruit someone to co-present Eric's design w/ Eric <kendall> ah, Tuscany... <scribe> ACTION: DaveB to work with EricP to clarify valueTesting proposal ETA 2 weeks [recorded in [21]http://www.w3.org/2005/04/05-dawg-minutes.html#action01] <DaveB> EricP's proposal seems not to refer to [22]http://www.w3.org/TR/xquery/#promotion Type Promotion of numeric types, which seems relevant. and has a typo or two re the 2nd test. [this is for my information] [22] http://www.w3.org/TR/xquery/#promotion <scribe> ACTION: HowardK to seek clarification on valueTesting w.r.t. differenced from XQuery [recorded in [23]http://www.w3.org/2005/04/05-dawg-minutes.html#action02] issue: sort <scribe> ACTION: PatH to review sort design [PENDING] [recorded in [24]http://www.w3.org/2005/04/05-dawg-minutes.html#action10] not started... <kendall> iirc, Kowari's itQL has sort <kendall> Jeen says something about comparing blank nodes and literals (?) Jeen: SerQL doesn't does offset/limit but not SORT, yet; due to requests, we're starting to have a stab at it <kendall> er, iTQL, I should say. <kendall> Versa also has sort. <kendall> how few is "widespread", I wonder Jos: ORDER BY doesn't make sense with CONSTRUCT <DaveB> [['Using ORDER BY on a solution sequence for a result form other than SELECT has no direct effect because only SELECT returns a sequence of results, not an RDF graph]] <kendall> order by only applies to SELECt -- we think! "Using ORDER BY on a solution sequence for a result form other than SELECT has no direct effect because only SELECT returns a sequence of results, not an RDF graph. However, in combination with LIMIT and OFFSET, it can be used to return partial results." <kendall> So, another proposal discussed where the prime designer or proponent isn't here. :> <kendall> tricky <SteveH> Yoshio, there isn;t a way to do that currently as far as I know <bijanp> (Not quite OT, but related, may be helpful, i'm unsure how reliable or good, but: [25]http://www.cs.umd.edu/Library/TRs/CS-TR-4611/CS-TR-4611.ps ) [25] http://www.cs.umd.edu/Library/TRs/CS-TR-4611/CS-TR-4611.ps <Yoshio> Hmm, we do need for that function to show users, for example, the total number of documents hit OPTIONS: 2 questions: 1 prefer to adopt this sort design (or something close) vs prefer to postpone. 2: probably object to postpone / object to this design or something close pref this sort design: 1 1 1 pref to postpone: 1 1 1 1 oppose postpone: 1 oppose sort: 1 <kendall> KevinW says that some of the complexity in the sort design is linked to complexity in other issues <Yoshio> in sorting we have an arbitrary ordering for the last resort, though <kendall> UMD cares more about limit with "next 10" than we do about sort <kendall> fwiw <DaveB> ref [26]http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-dawg-uc/#u2.19 [26] http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-dawg-uc/#u2.19 <kendall> fine-grained parsing of use cases that weren't intended to read that way (limit/offset seems like a protocol thing) <kendall> (er, that's off the record, I should have said!) <kendall> (limit & offset were originally in teh protocol, but i removed them at andy's urging, as I recall) PatH: limit/offset could be done with protocol tokens <bijan> limit is in the language now, see 10.1 yes, bijan... we're discussing whether that's the design we prefer <Zakim> Yoshio, you wanted to ask if there is a way (or need for tha way) to get just the number of the solutions and to say a project next to me deals with patent search, where user <bijan> Ah, ok. <howardk> for those interested, new version of XQuery WD is available at [27]http://www.w3.org/TR/xquery/ [27] http://www.w3.org/TR/xquery/ <Yoshio> to ask if "03"^^xsd:integer < "1"^^xsd:integer (lexical form rule 4.1) <DaveB> I think, yes it says that in the rq23 <Yoshio> Hmm, horrible, confusing at least <DaveB> actually I can't tell since those rules may/only apply if operator:< can't be used punctuationSyntax <kendall> There is reification syntax in rq23 <kendall> SteveH: the value of the current syntax is that it's "like" Turtle; so adding new stuff reduces that value <Yoshio> yes <JosD> yes <kendall> Yo: yes <DaveB> I'd agree with steve, jos <scribe> ACTION: DanC to propose to close punctuationSyntax (again) sans <<reifiction shorthand>> [recorded in [28]http://www.w3.org/2005/04/05-dawg-minutes.html#action03] SPARQL QL publication candidate <scribe> ACTION: [DONE] EricP to notify the WG of editors draft (or change of plans) [recorded in [29]http://www.w3.org/2005/04/05-dawg-minutes.html#action13] poll: PROPOSED: to publish [30]SPARQL QL editor's draft 1.290 as a W3C WD, with editorial and technical TODOs highlighted, with status ala "the WG is preparing for last call; while we do our internal review, the community is welcome to comment too." [30] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/ <kendall> Yoshio, KevinW, HowardK, PatH, Kendall, DaveB, SteveH -- support pub'ing now <DaveB> I found 2.4, 2.6 confusing in parts. 5.4, 9 defns baffled me. 2.7 & lots need section nos. <kendall> Jeen does too <kendall> JosD does by implication :> <kendall> no one seems opposed to publishing it, more relevantly <DaveB> (in typo land; 3.1 uri syntax wrong; 4.1 empty; 6.2 dc namespace urls wrong) After discussion of if/how to say "we're getting close to last call", DanC is inclined to do another round internally first. <scribe> ACTION: PatH to internal review of rq23, starting monday [recorded in [31]http://www.w3.org/2005/04/05-dawg-minutes.html#action04] <DaveB> reviewing just defns? or all? KendallC offers to copy-edit, noting it will use all his WG time <scribe> ACTION: DaveB to review rq23 editor's draft this week [recorded in [32]http://www.w3.org/2005/04/05-dawg-minutes.html#action05] <scribe> ACTION: [PENDING] AndyS to clarify 5.4 w/r/t closed world assumption [recorded in [33]http://www.w3.org/2005/04/05-dawg-minutes.html#action11] <scribe> ACTION: [PENDING] DaveB to consider dots in qnames, report on impact on turtle [recorded in [34]http://www.w3.org/2005/04/05-dawg-minutes.html#action12] <scribe> ACTION: [DROPPED] DanC to review editors draft (delivered 31 Mar) by 5 Mar [recorded in [35]http://www.w3.org/2005/04/05-dawg-minutes.html#action14] issue wsdlAbstractProtocol -> [36]protocol update [36] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005AprJun/0018.html KC: I split the WSDL into sparql-protocol-query.wsdl and sparql-protocol-graph.wsdl DC is interested in feedback from BT, AFS. KC is confident he can get it. <scribe> ACTION: KendallC to own wsdlAbstractProtocol (based on WSDL description added to protocol to editor's draft). continues [recorded in [37]http://www.w3.org/2005/04/05-dawg-minutes.html#action07] SPARQL Variable Results format <kendall> Has a new name... DB: I changed the title, since it's more than variable results... <kendall> what's the new name? <scribe> ACTION: DaveB to consider use of xsi:dataType ala comment from Steer continues [recorded in [38]http://www.w3.org/2005/04/05-dawg-minutes.html#action06] Test Suite Maintenance <scribe> ACTION: DaveB to to propose source test to approve continues [recorded in [39]http://www.w3.org/2005/04/05-dawg-minutes.html#action09] <scribe> ACTION: SteveH to prepare test cases for publication as WG Note (no deadline/urgency) [PENDING] [recorded in [40]http://www.w3.org/2005/04/05-dawg-minutes.html#action19] <scribe> ACTION: SteveH to to revise test manifest w.r.t. "background" and named graphs [PENDING] [recorded in [41]http://www.w3.org/2005/04/05-dawg-minutes.html#action20] <scribe> ACTION: AndyS to add the above graph test cases (analagous to valueTesting test cases) (don't expect quick delivery) [PENDING] [recorded in [42]http://www.w3.org/2005/04/05-dawg-minutes.html#action21] <scribe> ACTION: AndyS to propose a test re "x"^^mytype != "y"^^mytpe [PENDING] [recorded in [43]http://www.w3.org/2005/04/05-dawg-minutes.html#action22] <scribe> ACTION: DanC to follow up re optional test based on op:dateTime triple [PENDING] [recorded in [44]http://www.w3.org/2005/04/05-dawg-minutes.html#action23] <scribe> ACTION: EricP to pair with SteveH on making the HTML test results page [PENDING] [recorded in [45]http://www.w3.org/2005/04/05-dawg-minutes.html#action26] ADJOURN. _________________________________________________________________ KendallC and DanC for the DAWG $Date: 2005/04/05 20:36:35 $ Minutes formatted by David Booth's [46]scribe.perl version 1.122 [46] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Tuesday, 5 April 2005 20:40:34 UTC