Re: minutes RDF Data Access 5 Apr for review

Hi,

>From the following description,
it may read as (Jos and) I agreed to Steve's comment.

But the fact is that I typed in "yes"es to Dan's question
: Has anybody read the reification part? (or something similar)
(and so did Jos, I guess)

So,  I hope correction.
Maybe jsut removing our (or my?) "yes"es is good.

---------------
punctuationSyntax

<kendall> There is reification syntax in rq23

<kendall> SteveH: the value of the current syntax is that it's "like" 
Turtle; so adding new stuff reduces that value

<Yoshio> yes

<JosD> yes

<kendall> Yo: yes

<DaveB> I'd agree with steve, jos

<scribe> ACTION: DanC to propose to close punctuationSyntax (again) sans 
<<reifiction shorthand>> [recorded in 
http://www.w3.org/2005/04/05-dawg-minutes.html#action03]
----------------

Best,
Yoshio
fuku@w3.org
fukushige.yoshio@jp.panasonic.com

Received on Wednesday, 6 April 2005 05:37:55 UTC