- From: Yoshio FUKUSHIGE <fuku@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 14:37:51 +0900
- To: "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>, "RDF Data Access Working Group" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
- Cc: "Jeen Broekstra" <jeen@aduna.biz>
Hi, >From the following description, it may read as (Jos and) I agreed to Steve's comment. But the fact is that I typed in "yes"es to Dan's question : Has anybody read the reification part? (or something similar) (and so did Jos, I guess) So, I hope correction. Maybe jsut removing our (or my?) "yes"es is good. --------------- punctuationSyntax <kendall> There is reification syntax in rq23 <kendall> SteveH: the value of the current syntax is that it's "like" Turtle; so adding new stuff reduces that value <Yoshio> yes <JosD> yes <kendall> Yo: yes <DaveB> I'd agree with steve, jos <scribe> ACTION: DanC to propose to close punctuationSyntax (again) sans <<reifiction shorthand>> [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/04/05-dawg-minutes.html#action03] ---------------- Best, Yoshio fuku@w3.org fukushige.yoshio@jp.panasonic.com
Received on Wednesday, 6 April 2005 05:37:55 UTC