- From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 09:52:31 +0100
- To: Rob Shearer <Rob.Shearer@networkinference.com>, public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
Minor corrections: > Tom Adams agreed to take one of Simon's action items, seeing as Simon > has a lot to do. > > ACTION: Tom Adams: reply to Chris Wilper's comments on the > public-rdf-dawg-comments list Clarifying: The original item was: [[ ACTION: SimonR draft a reply to Chris Wilper and send draft to WG mailing list. ]] The action is to send a draft to the WG, not reply to the comments list. > ACTION Jos: discuss test suite documentation and maintenance with > SteveH, EricP, AndyS, ... Eric, Steve and I will be on IRC 14:30 UTC today (21/July) (15:30 UK, 10:30 Boston) > Steve, Eric, and Dan agreed to coordinate to get Steve Harris CVS write > access in order for him to maintain the tests. Eric pointed out that > several tests are kept in the N3QL document, and that it would be good > to integrate them with Steve Harris's tests. s/N3QL/BRQL/ Andy -------- Original Message -------- > From: Rob Shearer <> > Date: 20 July 2004 20:33 > > Minutes of RDF DAWG telecon 2004-07-20 for review > > Agenda: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JulSep/0114.html > > IRC: http://www.w3.org/2004/07/20-dawg-irc#T16-50-52-1 (includes > after-meeting discussion of strawman spec and the wording of the > disjunction requirement) > > 1. Convene, take roll, review record, agenda > > Attendees: Eric Prud'Hommeaux, Yoshio Fukushige, Steve Harris, Kendall > Clark, Andy Seaborne, Dave Beckett, Rob Shearer, Simon Raboczi, Dan > Connolly, Tom Adams > > Regrets: Howard Katz > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JulSep/0134.html > Alberto Reggiori > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JulSep/0115.html > Enrico Franconi > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JulSep/0116.html > Jim Hendler > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JulSep/0121.html > Jos De Roo > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JulSep/0133.html > Bryan Thompson > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JulSep/0135.html > Hiroyuki Sato > > Scribe: Rob Shearer > > Next meeting: Tuesday 2004-07-27 14:30 UTC, Dave Beckett to scribe > > As noted in agenda, the following actions will be continued: > > ACTION EricP: find out the schedule of the 2005 W3C tech plenary and > inform the WG so that we can plan ftf meetings after September. > > ACTION SimonR: write a document discussing tradeoffs with adapting > XQuery as an RDF query language for discussion thru the September > meeting in Bristol. > > ACTION Jos: explain log:includes to inform the discussion of SOURCE (nee > provenance) > > ACTION DanC: explain evolution of log:semantics/log:includes from > uri-is-graph to uri-is-doc in cwm, to inform discussion of SOURCE > > ACTION DaveB: explain the main uses seen for redland contexts with > respect to the provenance > > ACTION AndyS: explain DESCRIBE design implicit in BRQL spec. > > 2. Review Carlsbad meeting record > > The group resolved to adopt http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ftf2 > version 1.33 as a true record of the face-to-face meeting, with an > expectation of a few more minor edits by Dan Connolly, including the > addition of links to explanation of Network Inference's objections. > > Dan Connolly has attempted to get in touch with the Semantic Web CG in > support of his action item, but he does not feel the action has been > completed. > > ACTION DanC: notify Semantic Web CG of risks around the "1.5 > Relationship with XQuery" scope of our charter. > > 3. Web Services Directory use cases > > Rob Shearer clarified his action item from the face-to-face regarding > the ebXML use case, which he has not completed. > > ACTION: RobS write email to Farrukh about traversing a taxonomy, > continues. > > 4. Toward updated Use Cases and Requirements publication > > Kendall noted that there are still 6-8 outstanding changes which must > still be made to the document, and estimated that the work would be > complete by the end of business 2004-07-21, at which time other group > members could review it in time for the telecon on 2004-07-27. > > ACTION: RobS to review the document when complete > > Updates to the document should include all output from the face-to-face > meeting. > > Andy Seaborne noted a minor issue with CVS tags not being correctly > updated when the document changes. Kendall explained that this is a > toolset problem and that he will attempt to address it. > > It was also noted that the changelog could include links to the meeting > minutes or emails requesting each change; Kendall agreed that this would > be a good addition. > > It was pointed out that several people have actions which could impact > the UC&R document, including Simon's action to write about CONSTRUCT and > Eric's action to send a use case motivating premises. It was agreed that > the document could go ahead without these additions. > > ACTION ericP: send federation use case motivating premises (in Algae) > > The timing of the next publication was questioned, with Andy Seaborne > suggested that pushing it back by two weeks would be worthwhile if it > will substantially improve the document. Kendall claimed that the new > ebXML use case would be ready shortly, as well as some use case for > disjunction. It was agreed that we would be flexibly on publication > dates, but that 1 August still seems reasonable. > > Tom Adams agreed to take one of Simon's action items, seeing as Simon > has a lot to do. > > ACTION: Tom Adams: reply to Chris Wilper's comments on the > public-rdf-dawg-comments list > > There was a brief discussion of the "provenance" objective, rewritten by > Andy Seaborne to more directly address "aggregation", with Rob Shearer > thinking it sucks and Tom Adams and Yoshio thinking it's cool. The > rewritten objective will be included in the next publication and the > group will await public reaction. > > Yoshio's concerns about the new disjunction requirement > (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JulSep/0129.htm > l) were discussed, but it was agreed that email would be a more > productive form of engagement. > > ACTION DanC: follow up to > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JulSep/0129.html > > ACTION DanC: follow up to > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JulSep/0129.html > > 5. Test case maintenance > > Jos's action continues: > > ACTION Jos: discuss test suite documentation and maintenance with > SteveH, EricP, AndyS, ... > > Steve, Eric, and Dan agreed to coordinate to get Steve Harris CVS write > access in order for him to maintain the tests. Eric pointed out that > several tests are kept in the N3QL document, and that it would be good > to integrate them with Steve Harris's tests. > > The discussion turned to organization of DAWG online resources, > specifically the BRQL strawman spec. The meeting was adjourned and > informal discussion continued, reflected in the IRC log.
Received on Wednesday, 21 July 2004 04:53:09 UTC