- From: Alberto Reggiori <alberto@asemantics.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 19:09:00 +0200
- To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
regrets for tomorrow (19th July) telecon - me on holiday for few days Alberto On Jul 19, 2004, at 6:41 PM, Dan Connolly wrote: > > 1. Convene, take roll, review record, agenda > > RDF Data Access Working Group > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ > Tuesday 2004-07-20 14:30 UTC > Zakim Bridge +1.617.761.6200, conference 7333 ("RDFD") > http://www.w3.org/Guide/1998/08/teleconference-calendar#s_1343 > supplementary chat: irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg > log to appear: http://www.w3.org/2004/07/20-dawg-irc > > Scribe: ? > > next meeting: telcon 27 July. scribe volunteer? > > I propose to continue these without discussion (unless folks > make progress between now and the telcon). I hope to see progress > on them in the next week: > > ACTION EricP: find out the schedule of the 2005 W3C tech plenary and > inform the WG so that we can plan ftf meetings after September. > > ACTION SimonR: write a document discussing tradeoffs with adapting > XQuery as an RDF query language for discussion thru the September > meeting in Bristol. > > ACTION Jos: explain log:includes to inform the discussion of SOURCE > (nee provenance) > > ACTION DanC: explain evolution of log:semantics/log:includes from > uri-is-graph to uri-is-doc in cwm, to inform discussion of SOURCE > > ACTION DaveB: explain the main uses seen for redland contexts with > respect to the provenance > > ACTION AndyS: explain DESCRIBE design implicit in BRQL spec. > > agenda ammendments? > > > 2. Review Carlsbad meeting record > > Andy and Rob gave it an OK; I'm tidying up various > details. Would anybody like more time to look at it, > or shall we approve it this week? > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ftf2 > $Revision: 1.33 $ or perhaps something later > > I'll give an update on... > > ACTION DanC: notify Semantic Web CG of risks around the "1.5 > Relationship with XQuery" scope of our charter. > > > 3. Web Services Directory use cases > > ACTION Hendler: work with Bijan to do some sort of UDDI/Web services > use > case. from 2004-06-29 telcon > > ACTION Kendall: add ebXML UC. > > > 4. Toward updated Use Cases and Requirements publication > > Let's review our plan to get a new WD by ~ 1 Aug. > > As I write, this still seems to be the latest available draft: > $Revision: 1.123 $ of $Date: 2004/06/21 15:50:39 $ > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/UseCases > > ACTION Simon+Kendall elaborate the rel. of rules and "construct" in the > UC&R doc. > > ACTION EricP: offer implementation experience (perhaps in use case > form) > with premises and algae. done? annotea use case > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004AprJun/ > 0247.html > > ACTION: SimonR draft a reply to Chris Wilper and send draft to WG > mailing list. > > ACTION KendallC, AndyS: write up a new wording of 4.2 Provenance that > focuses on data management. > > ACTION SimonR: offer a replacement for 4.5 focussed on union query. > > ACTION Kendall: remove 4.4 User-specifiable Serialization > > ACTION RobS: help the editor find supporting use cases for disjuction. > done? > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JulSep/ > 0106.html > > ACTION KendallC: draft revision, toward updating our public WD, > delivery > ~next wed. > ACTION RobS: review it. > > > > 5. Test case maintenance > > ACTION Jos: discuss test suite documentation and maintenance with > SteveH, EricP, AndyS, ... > > > > -- > Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ >
Received on Monday, 19 July 2004 13:09:22 UTC