- From: Thompson, Bryan B. <BRYAN.B.THOMPSON@saic.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 10:51:39 -0400
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Regrets for today. Ongoing contractor nightmares over here. -bryan -----Original Message----- From: public-rdf-dawg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-rdf-dawg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Dan Connolly Sent: Monday, July 19, 2004 12:41 PM To: RDF Data Access Working Group Subject: Agenda: RDF Data Access 20 Jun 2004 1. Convene, take roll, review record, agenda RDF Data Access Working Group http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ Tuesday 2004-07-20 14:30 UTC Zakim Bridge +1.617.761.6200, conference 7333 ("RDFD") http://www.w3.org/Guide/1998/08/teleconference-calendar#s_1343 supplementary chat: irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg log to appear: http://www.w3.org/2004/07/20-dawg-irc Scribe: ? next meeting: telcon 27 July. scribe volunteer? I propose to continue these without discussion (unless folks make progress between now and the telcon). I hope to see progress on them in the next week: ACTION EricP: find out the schedule of the 2005 W3C tech plenary and inform the WG so that we can plan ftf meetings after September. ACTION SimonR: write a document discussing tradeoffs with adapting XQuery as an RDF query language for discussion thru the September meeting in Bristol. ACTION Jos: explain log:includes to inform the discussion of SOURCE (nee provenance) ACTION DanC: explain evolution of log:semantics/log:includes from uri-is-graph to uri-is-doc in cwm, to inform discussion of SOURCE ACTION DaveB: explain the main uses seen for redland contexts with respect to the provenance ACTION AndyS: explain DESCRIBE design implicit in BRQL spec. agenda ammendments? 2. Review Carlsbad meeting record Andy and Rob gave it an OK; I'm tidying up various details. Would anybody like more time to look at it, or shall we approve it this week? http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ftf2 $Revision: 1.33 $ or perhaps something later I'll give an update on... ACTION DanC: notify Semantic Web CG of risks around the "1.5 Relationship with XQuery" scope of our charter. 3. Web Services Directory use cases ACTION Hendler: work with Bijan to do some sort of UDDI/Web services use case. from 2004-06-29 telcon ACTION Kendall: add ebXML UC. 4. Toward updated Use Cases and Requirements publication Let's review our plan to get a new WD by ~ 1 Aug. As I write, this still seems to be the latest available draft: $Revision: 1.123 $ of $Date: 2004/06/21 15:50:39 $ http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/UseCases ACTION Simon+Kendall elaborate the rel. of rules and "construct" in the UC&R doc. ACTION EricP: offer implementation experience (perhaps in use case form) with premises and algae. done? annotea use case http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004AprJun/0247.html ACTION: SimonR draft a reply to Chris Wilper and send draft to WG mailing list. ACTION KendallC, AndyS: write up a new wording of 4.2 Provenance that focuses on data management. ACTION SimonR: offer a replacement for 4.5 focussed on union query. ACTION Kendall: remove 4.4 User-specifiable Serialization ACTION RobS: help the editor find supporting use cases for disjuction. done? http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JulSep/0106.html ACTION KendallC: draft revision, toward updating our public WD, delivery ~next wed. ACTION RobS: review it. 5. Test case maintenance ACTION Jos: discuss test suite documentation and maintenance with SteveH, EricP, AndyS, ... -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Tuesday, 20 July 2004 10:52:05 UTC