- From: Jeff Pollock <Jeff.Pollock@networkinference.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 11:24:13 -0700
- To: "Jeff Pollock" <Jeff.Pollock@networkinference.com>, <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CFE388CECDDB1E43AB1F60136BEB497324ACE4@rome.ad.networkinference.com>
All- As everyone in attendance at the DAWG FTF is aware, the Network Inference position is that XQuery represents an ideal concrete syntax to facilitate more widespread and rapid adoption of the semantic web stack, beyond just RDF. In support of the charter, NI proposes that the discussion of a strawman query language is not inherently at odds with an eventual XQuery based concrete syntax. The DAWG charter contemplates three stages of specification evolution; (1) strawman language, (2) abstract syntax and (3) concrete syntax. Network Inference does not perceive BRQL, RDQL, or N3QL proposals as necessarily excluding an eventual outcome that is consistent with an XQuery concrete syntax. The DAWG charter also clearly states that: "The RDF DAWG should aim to maximize W3C technology re-use, while also taking account of differences between the RDF graph data model and the XQuery data model" - thereby supporting our objective that XQuery be an integral part of an end-user's interface with the eventual DAWG language recommendation. Therefore, NI proposes that a new requirement be considered by this group: "The query language shall have an XQuery compatible concrete language syntax." Network Inference has formalized the rationale for this requirement in the attached document that explores the facets of why this is important to us, and ultimately as to why it should be important to the W3C community at large. Comments, stones, or support are welcome. Kind Regards, -Jeff-
Attachments
- application/octet-stream attachment: DAWG_req_proposal.pdf
Received on Thursday, 15 July 2004 14:26:41 UTC