- From: Thompson, Bryan B. <BRYAN.B.THOMPSON@saic.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 18:09:55 -0400
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
At least partial regrets. I have a staff meeting that got rescheduled over DAWG. -bryan -----Original Message----- From: public-rdf-dawg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-rdf-dawg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Dan Connolly Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 12:20 PM To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org Subject: Re: Agenda: RDF Data Access 29 June On Mon, 2004-06-28 at 09:38, Dan Connolly wrote: > [Since I owe an agenda by 14:30Z, here's what I've got so far.] 1. Convene, take roll, review record, agenda RDF Data Access Working Group http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ Tuesday 2004-06-29 14:30 UTC* Zakim Bridge +1.617.761.6200, conference 7333 ("RDFD") http://www.w3.org/Guide/1998/08/teleconference-calendar#s_1343 supplementary chat: irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg log to appear: http://www.w3.org/2004/06/29-dawg-irc Scribe: AndyS. Minutes of the RDF DAWG telcon 2004-06-22 for review http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004AprJun/0718.html next meeting: telcon 2004-07-06 scribe volunteer? DONE: ACTION to Kendall: remove 3.6 variant further input to todays agenda? 2. ftf update Registration form shows only 8 of the 18 WG members attending. Ouch. http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35463/DAWGf2f2/ Agenda in progress http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ftf2 $Revision: 1.4 $ ACTION to EricP: check with Rob/Network Inference if 2 hours teleconference facility can be organized on both days at 11am-1pm PST. (I've seen some progress, but I won't consider this really finished until the ftf2 page answers the questions I've seen.) 3. Streaming requirement ACTION to Kendall: include the new wording about streaming in the UC&R document. Group can then vote on its acceptance/rejection next week. done: "3.12 Streaming Results It must be possible, when returning multiple unordered results, for the client to request that results be streamed. When the client requests streaming results, all the data in one result must be available to the client before all the data for the next result." -- http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/UseCases#r3.12 PROPOSED: to adopt that requirement. 4. Testing ACTION SteveH: add ericP's disjunction tests to test cases doc - CONTINUED -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Monday, 28 June 2004 18:10:15 UTC