- From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:30:36 +0100
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
> further input to todays agenda? I was looking through the UC&R document: the next most important requirement to be worked on is "3.6 Optional Match". People are now experimenting in this area. I suggest we make some progress on this in the telecon. The current text is acceptable to me: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004AprJun/0476.html Suggestions for issues or better wordings? Andy -------- Original Message -------- > From: Dan Connolly <> > Date: 28 June 2004 17:20 > > On Mon, 2004-06-28 at 09:38, Dan Connolly wrote: > > [Since I owe an agenda by 14:30Z, here's what I've got so far.] > > > > > 1. Convene, take roll, review record, agenda > > RDF Data Access Working Group > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ > Tuesday 2004-06-29 14:30 UTC* > Zakim Bridge +1.617.761.6200, conference 7333 ("RDFD") > http://www.w3.org/Guide/1998/08/teleconference-calendar#s_1343 > supplementary chat: irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg > log to appear: http://www.w3.org/2004/06/29-dawg-irc > > Scribe: AndyS. > > Minutes of the RDF DAWG telcon 2004-06-22 for review > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004AprJun/0718.html > > next meeting: telcon 2004-07-06 > scribe volunteer? > > DONE: ACTION to Kendall: remove 3.6 variant > > further input to todays agenda? > > > 2. ftf update > > Registration form shows only 8 of the 18 WG members attending. Ouch. > http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35463/DAWGf2f2/ > > Agenda in progress > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ftf2 > $Revision: 1.4 $ > > ACTION to EricP: check with Rob/Network Inference if 2 hours > teleconference facility can be organized on both days at 11am-1pm PST. > (I've seen some progress, but I won't consider this really finished > until the ftf2 page answers the questions I've seen.) > > 3. Streaming requirement > > ACTION to Kendall: include the new wording about streaming > in the UC&R document. Group can then vote on its acceptance/rejection > next week. > > done: > > "3.12 Streaming Results > It must be possible, when returning multiple unordered results, for the > client to request that results be streamed. When the client requests > streaming results, all the data in one result must be available to the > client before all the data for the next result." > -- http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/UseCases#r3.12 > > PROPOSED: to adopt that requirement. > > > > > 4. Testing > > ACTION SteveH: add ericP's disjunction tests to test cases doc - > CONTINUED > > > -- > Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Monday, 28 June 2004 12:31:04 UTC