- From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 20:58:04 +0100
- To: "'Dan Connolly'" <connolly@w3.org>, "'RDF Data Access Working Group'" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
> Comments on today's agenda? > Are there specific proposals for requirements that I've > missed? especially any where email traffic shows at least > some support and no outstanding objections? There is proposal0283: [[ Support for a subset of XSD Datatypes The query language design must identify a set of XSD datatypes and operations on these datatypes. Test case of queries involving datatype operations will be developed. ]] With title from 0285 and one support in 0299 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004AprJun/0283.html Andy -------- Original Message -------- > From: public-rdf-dawg-request@w3.org <> > Date: 10 May 2004 16:55 > > 1. convene, take roll, review record, agenda > > RDF Data Access Working Group http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ > Tuesdays 10:30am-12:30pm/14:30-16:30 UTC > Zakim Bridge tel:+1.617.761.6200 , conference 7333 ("RDFD") > http://www.w3.org/Guide/1998/08/teleconference-calendar#s_1343 > supplementary chat: irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg > log to appear: http://www.w3.org/2004/05/11-dawg-irc > > scribe: Dave Beckett > > Roll call: see WG membership at > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/#who > > PROPOSED: to accept > > Minutes of RDF DAWG telcon 2004-05-04 for review > From: Rob Shearer <Rob.Shearer@networkinference.com> > Date: Fri, 7 May 2004 11:05:04 -0700 > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004AprJun > /0330.html > > as a true record of our last meeting. > > next telcon is scheduled for Tue, 18 Apr. > NOTE WELL: chair has a conflict > scribe volunteer? > > > misc actions from Amsterdam: > ACTION DanC: inform the TAG of the conflict between sec13.9 > of the HTTP spec and TAG's recommendation on issue 7 > > misc actions from 4May: > ACTION: EricP to set up a public comment list, and to work > with DanC to choose a name for it > > Comments on today's agenda? > Are there specific proposals for requirements that I've > missed? especially any where email traffic shows at least > some support and no outstanding objections? > > > > 2. Requirements: 3.1 Multi-edged Paths > > DONE: Andy Seaborne and Jean-François to rewrite 3.1 > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004AprJun > /0248.html > > proposal0248: [[ > 3.1 Multiple RDF triple matching > > The query langauge must include the capability to restrict > matches on the RDF graph by providing more than one RDF > triple pattern to be satisified in one query. ]] > > proposal0261: [[ > The query language must include the capability to restrict matches > by graph pattern on the queried graph by providing a graph pattern. > The graph pattern may consist of one, two or more RDF > triple patterns, > to be satisfied in one query. > ]] > > > proposal0269: [[ > The query language must include the capability to restrict > matches on a queried graph by providing a graph pattern, which may > consist of one or more RDF triple patterns, to be satisfied in one > query. ]] > > > 3. Requirement 3.2 Variable Binding Results > > DONE: Pat Hayes to summarize query/binding experience from > DQL summary of OWL-QL experiences > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004AprJun > /0245.html I'd like Pat to talk thru this message a bit. 4. Requirement 3.4 Subgraph Results DONE: EricP to write up implemention experience for 3.4 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004AprJun/0260.html ACTION: Steve Harris to express objections to 3.4 5. Use Cases Draft http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/UseCases v 1.39 or better ACTION: RobS to generate some RDF for the use cases ACTION: Kendall and Alberto to work on section 5.1.3 of this document 6. additional use cases ACTION DaveB: write up this educational metadata UC ACTION Yoshio: to write up "Kate finds an article and wants to find related programs..." Browsing Example - tell me about X, ACTION Steve Harris Bandwidth Efficiency - bytesize of resultset, ACTION SteveH ACTION Janne: write a use case to motivate the requirement of having queries written in RDF. (WITHDRAWN?) 7. Test materials ACTION SteveH: to draft and maintain a list of test sketch cases, including x < y, x < 18. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ see you at the WWW2004 in NY 15-21 May?
Received on Monday, 10 May 2004 15:58:28 UTC