- From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 20:58:04 +0100
- To: "'Dan Connolly'" <connolly@w3.org>, "'RDF Data Access Working Group'" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
> Comments on today's agenda?
> Are there specific proposals for requirements that I've
> missed? especially any where email traffic shows at least
> some support and no outstanding objections?
There is proposal0283:
[[ Support for a subset of XSD Datatypes
The query language design must identify a set of XSD datatypes and
operations on these datatypes. Test case of queries involving datatype
operations will be developed.
]]
With title from 0285 and one support in 0299
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004AprJun/0283.html
Andy
-------- Original Message --------
> From: public-rdf-dawg-request@w3.org <>
> Date: 10 May 2004 16:55
>
> 1. convene, take roll, review record, agenda
>
> RDF Data Access Working Group http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/
> Tuesdays 10:30am-12:30pm/14:30-16:30 UTC
> Zakim Bridge tel:+1.617.761.6200 , conference 7333 ("RDFD")
> http://www.w3.org/Guide/1998/08/teleconference-calendar#s_1343
> supplementary chat: irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg
> log to appear: http://www.w3.org/2004/05/11-dawg-irc
>
> scribe: Dave Beckett
>
> Roll call: see WG membership at
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/#who
>
> PROPOSED: to accept
>
> Minutes of RDF DAWG telcon 2004-05-04 for review
> From: Rob Shearer <Rob.Shearer@networkinference.com>
> Date: Fri, 7 May 2004 11:05:04 -0700
>
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004AprJun
> /0330.html
>
> as a true record of our last meeting.
>
> next telcon is scheduled for Tue, 18 Apr.
> NOTE WELL: chair has a conflict
> scribe volunteer?
>
>
> misc actions from Amsterdam:
> ACTION DanC: inform the TAG of the conflict between sec13.9
> of the HTTP spec and TAG's recommendation on issue 7
>
> misc actions from 4May:
> ACTION: EricP to set up a public comment list, and to work
> with DanC to choose a name for it
>
> Comments on today's agenda?
> Are there specific proposals for requirements that I've
> missed? especially any where email traffic shows at least
> some support and no outstanding objections?
>
>
>
> 2. Requirements: 3.1 Multi-edged Paths
>
> DONE: Andy Seaborne and Jean-François to rewrite 3.1
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004AprJun
> /0248.html
>
> proposal0248: [[
> 3.1 Multiple RDF triple matching
>
> The query langauge must include the capability to restrict
> matches on the RDF graph by providing more than one RDF
> triple pattern to be satisified in one query. ]]
>
> proposal0261: [[
> The query language must include the capability to restrict matches
> by graph pattern on the queried graph by providing a graph pattern.
> The graph pattern may consist of one, two or more RDF
> triple patterns,
> to be satisfied in one query.
> ]]
>
>
> proposal0269: [[
> The query language must include the capability to restrict
> matches on a queried graph by providing a graph pattern, which may
> consist of one or more RDF triple patterns, to be satisfied in one
> query. ]]
>
>
> 3. Requirement 3.2 Variable Binding Results
>
> DONE: Pat Hayes to summarize query/binding experience from
> DQL summary of OWL-QL experiences
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004AprJun
> /0245.html
I'd like Pat to talk thru this message a bit.
4. Requirement 3.4 Subgraph Results
DONE: EricP to write up implemention experience for 3.4
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004AprJun/0260.html
ACTION: Steve Harris to express objections to 3.4
5. Use Cases Draft
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/UseCases
v 1.39 or better
ACTION: RobS to generate some RDF for the use cases
ACTION: Kendall and Alberto to work on section 5.1.3 of this document
6. additional use cases
ACTION DaveB: write up this educational metadata UC
ACTION Yoshio: to write up "Kate finds an article and wants to find
related programs..."
Browsing Example - tell me about X, ACTION Steve Harris
Bandwidth Efficiency - bytesize of resultset, ACTION SteveH
ACTION Janne: write a use case to motivate the requirement of having
queries written in RDF. (WITHDRAWN?)
7. Test materials
ACTION SteveH: to draft and maintain a list of test sketch cases,
including x < y, x < 18.
--
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
see you at the WWW2004 in NY 15-21 May?
Received on Monday, 10 May 2004 15:58:28 UTC