- From: Steve Harris <S.W.Harris@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 10:14:00 +0100
- To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 10:55:02 -0500, Dan Connolly wrote: > 4. Requirement 3.4 Subgraph Results > > DONE: EricP to write up implemention experience for 3.4 > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004AprJun/0260.html > > ACTION: Steve Harris to express objections to 3.4 My concern with 3.4 is mostly related to the part about "Executing the query on such a subgraph would yield the same subgraph; if obtaining variable bindings, the same variable bindings would be obtained." This seems a bit overly restrictive and effectively rules out some things we might like, as described in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004AprJun/0276.html - Steve
Received on Tuesday, 11 May 2004 05:14:33 UTC