public-rdf-dawg@w3.org from April to June 2004 by date

Thursday, 1 July 2004

• Re: Ambiguity and 4.5 Aggregate Query (and screw case) Eric Prud'hommeaux

Wednesday, 30 June 2004

• Re: Ambiguity and 4.5 Aggregate Query (and screw case) Simon Raboczi
• RE: RDQL + DAWG = BRQL Seaborne, Andy
• RE: a more general optional arcs implementation Seaborne, Andy
• RE: Ambiguity and 4.5 Aggregate Query (and screw case) Seaborne, Andy
• Minutes of RDF DAWG telecon 2004-06-29 for review Seaborne, Andy
• RE: UPDATED: Precis of Design Evaluations Howard Katz

Tuesday, 29 June 2004

• Re: RDQL + DAWG = BRQL Alberto Reggiori
• a more general optional arcs implementation Eric Prud'hommeaux
• An evaluation of TriQL Yoshio Fukushige
• Re: Precise of Design Evaluations Yoshio Fukushige
• Yet more candidates(revised) Yoshio Fukushige
• Yet more candidates for requriements and design objectives [was Re: possible regrets] Yoshio Fukushige
• DesignEvaluations page Kendall Clark
• Re: Test cases Steve Harris
• RE: UPDATED: Precis of Design Evaluations Dan Connolly
• RE: XSRQL proposal Howard Katz
• Yet more candidates(revised) Yoshio FUKUSHIGE
• An evaluation of TriQL Yoshio FUKUSHIGE
• Re: Test cases Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Test cases Dan Connolly
• Re: Test cases Steve Harris
• Re: Ambiguity and 4.5 Aggregate Query (and screw case) Kendall Clark
• RE: Test cases Seaborne, Andy
• RE: XSRQL proposal Howard Katz
• Agenda: RDF Data Access 29 Jun (rev 3) Dan Connolly
• Re: RDQL functionality vs. DAWG requirements Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Ambiguity and 4.5 Aggregate Query (and screw case) Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: RDQL functionality vs. DAWG requirements Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: XSRQL proposal Steve Harris
• RE: UPDATED: Precis of Design Evaluations Seaborne, Andy
• Re: Algae Evaluation Eric Prud'hommeaux
• RE: XSRQL proposal Seaborne, Andy
• Re: Agenda: RDF Data Access 29 June Steve Harris
• RE: XSRQL proposal Jos De_Roo

Monday, 28 June 2004

• RE: UPDATED: Precis of Design Evaluations Howard Katz
• Re: UPDATED: Precis of Design Evaluations Kendall Clark
• RE: XSRQL proposal Howard Katz
• Re: UPDATED: Precis of Design Evaluations Alberto Reggiori
• RE: Agenda: RDF Data Access 29 June Thompson, Bryan B.
• Re: RDF QLs within a larger language Jos De_Roo
• RE: XSRQL proposal Seaborne, Andy
• RE: RDF QLs within a larger language Seaborne, Andy
• UPDATED: Precis of Design Evaluations Kendall Clark
• RE: RDF QLs within a larger language Dirk-Willem van Gulik
• Algae Evaluation Dave Beckett
• RE: XSRQL proposal Howard Katz
• which RDF data access designs do you support? WBS questionnaire Dan Connolly
• RE: RDF QLs within a larger language Seaborne, Andy
• RE: RDF QLs within a larger language Howard Katz
• RE: RDF QLs within a larger language Dirk-Willem van Gulik
• RE: Agenda: RDF Data Access 29 June Seaborne, Andy
• Re: Agenda: RDF Data Access 29 June Dan Connolly
• Re: Precise of Design Evaluations Dan Connolly
• RE: RDF QLs within a larger language Seaborne, Andy
• Precise of Design Evaluations Kendall Clark
• UC&R freeze Kendall Clark
• RE: test case results expressed in ResultSet terms Seaborne, Andy
• Regrets Steve Harris
• Agenda: RDF Data Access 29 June (in progress) Dan Connolly
• RE: RDF QLs within a larger language Howard Katz
• RE: XSRQL proposal Howard Katz
• RDF QLs within a larger language Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: XSRQL proposal Eric Prud'hommeaux

Sunday, 27 June 2004

• XSRQL proposal Howard Katz
• Re: test case results expressed in ResultSet terms Jos De_Roo
• Re: test case results expressed in ResultSet terms Eric Prud'hommeaux

Saturday, 26 June 2004

• Re: test case results expressed in ResultSet terms Jos De Roo
• test case results expressed in ResultSet terms Eric Prud'hommeaux

Friday, 25 June 2004

• Re: ACTION: elaborate on 4.4 Eric Prud'hommeaux

Thursday, 24 June 2004

• RE: ACTION: elaborate on 4.4 Seaborne, Andy
• Re: ACTION: elaborate on 4.4 Kendall Clark
• RE: ACTION: elaborate on 4.4 Jim Hendler
• Re: ACTION: elaborate on 4.4 Kendall Clark
• RE: ACTION: elaborate on 4.4 Rob Shearer
• RE: ACTION: elaborate on 4.4 Jim Hendler
• RE: ACTION: elaborate on 4.4 Rob Shearer
• RE: ACTION: elaborate on 4.4 Rob Shearer
• Re: ACTION: elaborate on 4.4 Kendall Clark
• RE: ACTION: elaborate on 4.4 Jim Hendler
• RE: ACTION: elaborate on 4.4 Rob Shearer
• BRQL implementation Seaborne, Andy
• RE: ACTION: elaborate on 4.4 Dirk-Willem van Gulik
• RE: ACTION: elaborate on 4.4 Dirk-Willem van Gulik

Wednesday, 23 June 2004

• RE: Test cases Howard Katz
• Re: Test cases Steve Harris
• Minutes of the RDF DAWG telcon 2004-06-22 for review Janne Saarela
• Re: Use Case: Searching for educational learning materials Bijan Parsia
• Re: Test cases Eric Prud'hommeaux

Tuesday, 22 June 2004

• RE: Test cases Howard Katz
• Test cases Steve Harris
• Re: Booleans as the degenerate case of variable binding results Simon Raboczi
• Re: Booleans as the degenerate case of variable binding results Pat Hayes
• RE: Agenda: RDF Data Access WG 22 Jun - partial regrets Thompson, Bryan B.
• Regrets for todays meeting Farrukh Najmi
• Re: Booleans as the degenerate case of variable binding results Kendall Clark
• Re: Booleans as the degenerate case of variable binding results Simon Raboczi
• RE: Streamability II Seaborne, Andy
• Re: Streamability II Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Streamability II Jean-François Baget
• RE: Streamability II Seaborne, Andy
• Re: July Carlsbad ftf page in place; agenda in progress Alberto Reggiori
• Re: Use Case: Searching for educational learning materials Dave Beckett
• Re: Streamability II Janne Saarela
• possible regrets Yoshio Fukushige

Monday, 21 June 2004

• Re: extensibility Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Streamability II Tom Adams
• Re: extensibility Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Qustions about UC&R 1.114 Eric Prud'hommeaux
• RE: Qustions about UC&R 1.114 Seaborne, Andy
• Re: Qustions about UC&R 1.114 Kendall Clark
• RE: extensibility Seaborne, Andy
• Qustions about UC&R 1.114 Seaborne, Andy
• Re: Agenda: RDF Data Access WG 22 Jun Kendall Clark
• Re: Agenda: RDF Data Access WG 22 Jun Jim Hendler
• Agenda: RDF Data Access WG 22 Jun Eric Prud'hommeaux
• extensibility Eric Prud'hommeaux

Saturday, 19 June 2004

• Re: Use Case: Searching for educational learning materials Bijan Parsia
• Re: Use Case: Searching for educational learning materials Kendall Clark
• Re: Use Case: Searching for educational learning materials Steve Harris
• Re: promote provenance to a requirement? Steve Harris
• Re: candidate requirement: boolean query Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Streamability II Tom Adams

Friday, 18 June 2004

• RE: Rates at the Residence Inn Rob Shearer
• July Carlsbad ftf page in place; agenda in progress Dan Connolly
• RE: candidate requirement: boolean query Seaborne, Andy
• UC&R 1.114 Kendall Clark
• Re: Use Case: Searching for educational learning materials Kendall Clark
• Re: promote provenance to a requirement? Kendall Clark
• promote provenance to a requirement? Kendall Clark
• Re: ACTION: elaborate on 4.4 (URIs in Accept) Dan Connolly
• RE: ACTION: elaborate on 4.4 Thompson, Bryan B.
• RE: ACTION: elaborate on 4.4 Seaborne, Andy
• Re: ACTION: elaborate on 4.4 Kendall Clark
• RE: ACTION: elaborate on 4.4 Seaborne, Andy
• Re: candidate requirement: boolean query Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: ACTION: elaborate on 4.4 Kendall Clark
• RE: ACTION: elaborate on 4.4 Thompson, Bryan B.
• RE: ACTION: elaborate on 4.4 Seaborne, Andy
• RE: ACTION: elaborate on 4.4 Howard Katz
• Re: candidate requirement: boolean query Kendall Clark
• RE: candidate requirement: boolean query Seaborne, Andy
• RE: Streamability II Seaborne, Andy
• Re: ACTION: elaborate on 4.4 Kendall Clark
• Re: ACTION: elaborate on 4.4 Kendall Clark
• candidate requirement: boolean query Kendall Clark
• Re: Booleans as the degenerate case of variable binding results Kendall Clark

Thursday, 17 June 2004

• RE: toward an intial design... any more evaluations? Dan Connolly
• Important -- fill out f2f registration form regardless of attendance Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Streamability II Tom Adams
• RE: toward an intial design... any more evaluations? Seaborne, Andy
• RDQL + DAWG = BRQL Seaborne, Andy
• Optional triples Seaborne, Andy
• Re: More candidates for requirements and objectives [Was: Re: toward an intial design... any more evaluations?] Yoshio Fukushige

Wednesday, 16 June 2004

• RE: toward an intial design... any more evaluations? Howard Katz
• RE: Streamability II Seaborne, Andy
• RE: toward an intial design... any more evaluations? Dan Connolly
• RE: toward an intial design... any more evaluations? Howard Katz
• KB query interfaces (related to streaming queries) Jim Hendler
• New use case - story form Jim Hendler
• Re: Streamability Farrukh Najmi
• Re: toward an intial design... any more evaluations? Kendall Clark
• Re: Minutes of RDF DAWG telecon Tuesday 2004-06-15 for review Farrukh Najmi
• Minutes of RDF DAWG telecon Tuesday 2004-06-15 for review Farrukh Najmi
• Re: Streamability II Tom Adams
• Re: Streamability II Janne Saarela
• Streamability II Seaborne, Andy
• Re: toward an intial design... any more evaluations? Yoshio Fukushige
• Re: Streamability Janne Saarela
• More candidates for requirements and objectives [Was: Re: toward an intial design... any more evaluations?] Yoshio Fukushige

Tuesday, 15 June 2004

• Booleans as the degenerate case of variable binding results Simon Raboczi
• toward an intial design... any more evaluations? Dan Connolly
• RE: disjunction implementation Seaborne, Andy
• use case: Content Selection for Device Independence Dan Connolly
• Re: disjunction implementation Dan Connolly
• Re: disjunction implementation Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Use Case: Searching for educational learning materials Dave Beckett
• Regrets Howard Katz

Monday, 14 June 2004

• Re: disjunction implementation Dan Connolly
• Agenda: RDF Data Access WG 15 Jun Dan Connolly
• scribe expectations Dan Connolly
• nearby airport and meeting time Eric Prud'hommeaux
• f2f registration form tweaked Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: New use case - RDFS/OWL related Jim Hendler

Sunday, 13 June 2004

• Re: New use case - RDFS/OWL related Dirk-Willem van Gulik
• Re: Objective 4.6 -- additional semantic information Jim Hendler

Saturday, 12 June 2004

• RE: REX evaluation Rob Shearer
• RE: REX evaluation Seaborne, Andy
• Re: disjunction implementation Jos De_Roo
• disjunction implementation Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Introduction - Tom Adams Tom Adams

Friday, 11 June 2004

• Re: requirement 3.10 (was Re: Minutes of RDF DAWG telecon Tuesday 2004-06-08 for review) Kevin Wilkinson
• Re: Subgraph results counter-example(s) Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Subgraph results counter-example(s) Dan Connolly
• Re: Objective 4.6 -- additional semantic information Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Objective 4.6 -- additional semantic information Jim Hendler
• RE: ACTION: elaborate on 4.4 Seaborne, Andy
• RE: LIMITs Seaborne, Andy
• Streamability Seaborne, Andy
• RE: Draft Requirement: Streamable results Seaborne, Andy
• RE: Objective 4.6 -- additional semantic information Seaborne, Andy
• Re: Objective 4.6 -- additional semantic information Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Indulgent SQL diversion Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Subgraph results counter-example(s) Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: requirement 3.10 (was Re: Minutes of RDF DAWG telecon Tuesday 2004-06-08 for review) Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: ACTION: elaborate on 4.4 Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: optional arcs implementation Eric Prud'hommeaux
• optional arcs implementation Eric Prud'hommeaux

Thursday, 10 June 2004

• requirement 3.10 (was Re: Minutes of RDF DAWG telecon Tuesday 2004-06-08 for review) Kevin Wilkinson
• Subject lines [was: Minutes ...] Dan Connolly
• RE: Provenance (was RE: REX evaluation) Howard Katz
• Re: Minutes of RDF DAWG telecon Tuesday 2004-06-08 for review Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: User-defined result formatting (was RE: REX evaluation) Kendall Clark
• Re: Provenance (was RE: REX evaluation) Kendall Clark
• Re: Provenance (was RE: REX evaluation) Jim Hendler
• User-defined result formatting (was RE: REX evaluation) Rob Shearer
• Provenance (was RE: REX evaluation) Rob Shearer
• Re: REX evaluation Kendall Clark
• Re: Objective 4.6 -- additional semantic information Kendall Clark
• RE: Objective 4.6 -- additional semantic information Jim Hendler
• RE: Objective 4.6 -- additional semantic information Rob Shearer
• RE: Objective 4.6 -- additional semantic information Jim Hendler

Wednesday, 9 June 2004

• RE: Objective 4.6 -- additional semantic information Rob Shearer
• RE: Minutes of RDF DAWG telecon Tuesday 2004-06-08 for review Rob Shearer
• Re: Minutes of RDF DAWG telecon Tuesday 2004-06-08 for review Kevin Wilkinson
• RE: REX evaluation Howard Katz
• RE: Objective 4.6 -- additional semantic information Jim Hendler
• Re: Minutes of RDF DAWG telecon Tuesday 2004-06-08 for review Eric Prud'hommeaux
• RE: Minutes of RDF DAWG telecon Tuesday 2004-06-08 for review Jim Hendler
• RE: REX evaluation Rob Shearer
• RE: Objective 4.6 -- additional semantic information Jos De_Roo
• Re: REX evaluation Kendall Clark
• REX evaluation Rob Shearer
• RE: Objective 4.6 -- additional semantic information Rob Shearer
• RE: Objective 4.6 -- additional semantic information Rob Shearer
• Re: Draft Requirement: Streamable results Dave Beckett
• Re: Minutes of RDF DAWG telecon Tuesday 2004-06-08 for review Dan Connolly
• RE: Minutes of RDF DAWG telecon Tuesday 2004-06-08 for review Seaborne, Andy
• Draft Requirement: Streamable results Seaborne, Andy
• Re: Objective 4.6 -- additional semantic information Steve Harris
• RE: Objective 4.6 -- additional semantic information Seaborne, Andy
• RE: Objective 4.6 -- additional semantic information Seaborne, Andy
• RE: Subgraph results counter-example(s) Seaborne, Andy
• Re: Objective 4.6 -- additional semantic information Kendall Clark
• RE: Objective 4.6 -- additional semantic information Jim Hendler
• RE: Objective 4.6 -- additional semantic information Rob Shearer

Tuesday, 8 June 2004

• RE: Objective 4.6 -- additional semantic information Jos De_Roo
• RE: Objective 4.6 -- additional semantic information Rob Shearer
• RE: Objective 4.6 -- additional semantic information Jos De_Roo
• RE: Objective 4.6 -- additional semantic information Dan Connolly
• Re: Objective 4.6 -- additional semantic information Jos De_Roo
• RE: Objective 4.6 -- additional semantic information Rob Shearer
• Re: Objective 4.6 -- additional semantic information Dan Connolly
• Re: second face-to-face meeting, 14-15 July, Carlsbad, CA Dan Connolly
• Re: Objective 4.6 -- additional semantic information Kendall Clark
• second face-to-face meeting, 14-15 July, Carlsbad, CA Rob Shearer
• Minutes of RDF DAWG telecon Tuesday 2004-06-08 for review Jos De_Roo
• RE: Objective 4.6 -- additional semantic information Rob Shearer
• Re: Objective 4.6 -- additional semantic information Kendall Clark
• RE: Objective 4.6 -- additional semantic information Rob Shearer
• Re: ACTION: elaborate on 4.4 Kendall Clark
• Re: UC&R 1.112 Kendall Clark
• UC&R 1.112 Kendall Clark
• Objective 4.6 -- additional semantic information Jim Hendler
• bounced regrets Thompson, Bryan B.
• Re: Subgraph results counter-example(s) Kendall Clark
• Subgraph results counter-example(s) Rob Shearer
• RE: New use case - RDFS/OWL related Jim Hendler
• RE: New use case - RDFS/OWL related Seaborne, Andy
• RE: New use case - RDFS/OWL related Jim Hendler
• RE: New use case - RDFS/OWL related Seaborne, Andy

Monday, 7 June 2004

• bindings and bookmarkable queries Jos De_Roo
• ACTION: elaborate on 4.4 Kendall Clark
• Re: Minutes of RDF DAWG telcon 2004-06-01 for review Dan Connolly
• Agenda: RDF Data Access WG telcon 8 Jun Dan Connolly
• New use case - RDFS/OWL related Jim Hendler
• Re: iTQL evaluation Dan Connolly
• Re: iTQL evaluation Kendall Clark
• Re: UC&R published (tweaked live copy) Dan Connolly
• Re: UC&R published (abstract buzzwords) Dan Connolly
• Re: iTQL evaluation Simon Raboczi
• DAWG f2f July 14-15 Rob Shearer

Friday, 4 June 2004

• iTQL evaluation Kendall Clark
• [gk@ninebynine.org: http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-rdf-dawg-uc-20040602/] Kendall Clark

Thursday, 3 June 2004

• Re: Bandwidth efficiency Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: RDQL functionality vs. DAWG requirements Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: UC&R published Kendall Clark
• RE: UC&R published Howard Katz
• RE: UC&R published Howard Katz
• UC&R published Kendall Clark

Wednesday, 2 June 2004

• Re: RDQL functionality vs. DAWG requirements Steve Harris
• Result set lantecy Steve Harris
• RE: Bandwidth efficiency Howard Katz
• Re: Bandwidth efficiency Steve Harris
• SeRQL evaluation Seaborne, Andy
• Re: Bandwidth efficiency Steve Harris
• RE: RDQL functionality vs. DAWG requirements Seaborne, Andy
• RE: Bandwidth efficiency Seaborne, Andy
• RE: Bandwidth efficiency Howard Katz
• Re: Bandwidth efficiency Steve Harris
• RE: Bandwidth efficiency Howard Katz

Tuesday, 1 June 2004

• Minutes of RDF DAWG telcon 2004-06-01 for review Kevin Wilkinson
• Re: RDQL functionality vs. DAWG requirements Alberto Reggiori
• Bandwidth efficiency Steve Harris
• Re: RDQL functionality vs. DAWG requirements Alberto Reggiori
• Re: RDQL functionality vs. DAWG requirements Dan Connolly
• Re: RDQL functionality vs. DAWG requirements Steve Harris
• DAWG Test Sketch Cases Steve Harris
• Regrets Yoshio Fukushige
• RDQL functionality vs. DAWG requirements Eric Prud'hommeaux
• RE: Minutes of RDF DAWG telcon 2004-05-25 for review Dan Connolly
• RE: ACTION: writeup of joseki in response to action taken at last DAW G telcon. Dan Connolly
• RE: Requirement: 3.4 Subgraph Results Seaborne, Andy
• RE: ACTION: writeup of joseki in response to action taken at last DAW G telcon. Thompson, Bryan B.
• Re: ACTION: writeup of joseki in response to action taken at last DAW G telcon. Dan Connolly
• ACTION: writeup of joseki in response to action taken at last DAW G telcon. Thompson, Bryan B.
• Agenda: RDF Data Access WG telcon 1Jun (in progress) Dan Connolly

Monday, 31 May 2004

• RE: Minutes of RDF DAWG telcon 2004-05-25 for review Howard Katz

Sunday, 30 May 2004

• Introduction - Jim Hendler Jim Hendler

Friday, 28 May 2004

• Re: Requirement: 3.4 Subgraph Results Jos De_Roo
• Requirement: 3.4 Subgraph Results Seaborne, Andy
• Re: v1.89 3.10a - Iterative Query Farrukh Najmi
• Re: v1.89 3.10a - Iterative Query Farrukh Najmi
• RE: v1.89 3.10a - Iterative Query Seaborne, Andy

Thursday, 27 May 2004

• Minutes of RDF DAWG telcon 2004-05-25 for review Howard Katz
• Re: no version num on current uc doc Dan Connolly
• no version num on current uc doc Howard Katz
• W3C system notices, FYI Dan Connolly
• Requirement: 3.6 Optional Match Seaborne, Andy
• DRAFT / SeRQL evaluation Seaborne, Andy
• RE: *DRAFT*: writeup of joseki in response to action taken at las t DA WG telcon. Seaborne, Andy

Wednesday, 26 May 2004

• Re: *DRAFT*: writeup of joseki in response to action taken at last DA WG telcon. Dan Connolly
• *DRAFT*: writeup of joseki in response to action taken at last DA WG telcon. Thompson, Bryan B.

Tuesday, 25 May 2004

• Re: temporary location of UC&R doc Alberto Reggiori
• temporary location of UC&R doc Kendall Clark
• Re: v1.89 3.10a - Iterative Query Farrukh Najmi
• Re: Comments on "DAWG use cases and requirements" v1.89 Kendall Clark
• v1.89 3.10a - Iterative Query Seaborne, Andy
• Re: a request for help Kendall Clark
• Re: a request for help Yoshio Fukushige
• Re: a request for help Farrukh Najmi
• RE: Building a bridge from RDF to the web? Howard Katz
• RE: Building a bridge from RDF to the web? Thompson, Bryan B.
• Comments on "DAWG use cases and requirements" v1.89 Thompson, Bryan B.
• RE: Building a bridge from RDF to the web? Seaborne, Andy
• RE: Building a bridge from RDF to the web? Thompson, Bryan B.
• RE: Building a bridge from RDF to the web? Seaborne, Andy
• RE: Building a bridge from RDF to the web? Thompson, Bryan B.
• RE: Building a bridge from RDF to the web? Seaborne, Andy
• Human-friendly Syntax (was: Agenda: RDF Data Access WG telcon 25M ay) Seaborne, Andy
• Re: a request for help Kendall Clark

Monday, 24 May 2004

• Re: Agenda: RDF Data Access WG telcon 25May Jos De_Roo
• Re: a request for help Yoshio Fukushige
• Building a bridge from RDF to the web? Thompson, Bryan B.
• RE: Agenda: RDF Data Access WG telcon 25May Seaborne, Andy
• Re: Agenda: RDF Data Access WG telcon 25May Kendall Clark
• Re: Agenda: RDF Data Access WG telcon 25May Kendall Clark
• Agenda: RDF Data Access WG telcon 25May Dan Connolly
• Re: a request for help (title) Dan Connolly
• a request for help Kendall Clark

Friday, 21 May 2004

• RE: F2F schedule Howard Katz

Thursday, 20 May 2004

• Fwd: DAWG Use Case: Browser Steve Harris

Wednesday, 19 May 2004

• Re: DAWGs at W3C - preferred time: wed, 19 May 12:30-14:00 (lunch). Yoshio Fukushige
• RE: F2F schedule Seaborne, Andy

Tuesday, 18 May 2004

• Re: F2F schedule Dan Connolly
• F2F schedule Howard Katz
• UC&R 1.84 Kendall Clark
• RE: I can accept... (Was: Re: Objective 4.6: additional semantic knowledge) Dan Connolly
• Re: I can accept... (Was: Re: Objective 4.6: additional semantic knowledge) Kendall Clark
• RE: I can accept... (Was: Re: Objective 4.6: additional semantic knowledge) Rob Shearer

Monday, 17 May 2004

• DAWGs at W3C - preferred time: wed, 19 May 12:30-14:00 (lunch). Thompson, Bryan B.
• Re: DAWGs at W3C? Yoshio Fukushige
• Re: DAWGs at W3C? Steve Harris
• RE: RDF Graph Patterns Pat Hayes
• Re: I can accept... (Was: Re: Objective 4.6: additional semantic knowledge) Jos De_Roo
• RE: I can accept... (Was: Re: Objective 4.6: additional semantic knowledge) Seaborne, Andy
• Re: I can accept... (Was: Re: Objective 4.6: additional semantic knowledge) Pat Hayes
• Re: I can accept... (Was: Re: Objective 4.6: additional semantic knowledge) Kendall Clark
• RE: I can accept... (Was: Re: Objective 4.6: additional semantic knowledge) Seaborne, Andy
• RE: UC&R: comments on v1.74 Seaborne, Andy
• RE: I can accept... (Was: Re: Objective 4.6: additional semantic knowledge) Pat Hayes
• RE: RDF Graph Patterns Seaborne, Andy
• Re: UC&R: comments on v1.74 Kendall Clark
• Re: uc&r 1.72 Kendall Clark
• RE: I can accept... (Was: Re: Objective 4.6: additional semantic knowledge) Rob Shearer
• RE: DAWGs at W3C? Seaborne, Andy
• Re: DAWGs at W3C? Dan Connolly
• I can accept... (Was: Re: Objective 4.6: additional semantic knowledge) Kendall Clark
• Re: Objective 4.6: additional semantic knowledge Pat Hayes
• Re: RDF Graph Patterns Pat Hayes
• UC&R: comments on v1.74 Seaborne, Andy
• RE: Bookmarkable queries Seaborne, Andy

Friday, 14 May 2004

• Re: Bookmarkable queries Farrukh Najmi
• RE: Bookmarkable queries Jos De_Roo
• Re: uc&r 1.72 (linking status to decision records) Dan Connolly
• RE: Bookmarkable queries Seaborne, Andy
• Re: uc&r 1.72 Kevin Wilkinson

Thursday, 13 May 2004

• Re: uc&r 1.72 Kendall Clark
• RE: Bookmarkable queries Jos De_Roo
• Re: uc&r 1.72 Dan Connolly
• Re: comments on uc document howardk@fatdog.com
• uc&r 1.72 Kendall Clark
• Re: Optional triples and may-bind variables Eric Prud'hommeaux
• comments on uc document howardk@fatdog.com
• Re: comments on uc document Kendall Clark
• Re: uc&r 1.71 Kendall Clark
• RE: uc&r 1.71 Seaborne, Andy
• Re: uc&r 1.71 Kendall Clark
• Re: UC&R 1.56 Kendall Clark
• RE: uc&r 1.71 Seaborne, Andy
• RE: Objective 4.6: additional semantic knowledge Seaborne, Andy
• Re: Objective 4.6: additional semantic knowledge Eric Prud'hommeaux
• RE: Bookmarkable queries Seaborne, Andy
• RDF Graph Patterns Seaborne, Andy
• RE: Optional triples and may-bind variables Seaborne, Andy
• RE: UC&R 1.56 Seaborne, Andy
• uc&r 1.71 Kendall Clark

Wednesday, 12 May 2004

• Re: Subgraph results Pat Hayes
• Re: Minutes of RDF DAWG telcon 2004-05-11 for review Pat Hayes
• Minutes of RDF DAWG telcon 2004-05-11 for review Dave Beckett
• RE: tunneling a restricted set... [was: RE: A Comparison of RDF Query Lan guages] Adrian Walker
• RE: On the treatment of Design Objectives? Seaborne, Andy
• Wilbur Query Language [was: RE: A Comparison of RDF Query Languages] Ora.Lassila@nokia.com
• RE: On the treatment of Design Objectives? Rob Shearer
• Re: On the treatment of Design Objectives? Yoshio FUKUSHIGE

Tuesday, 11 May 2004

• Objective 4.6: additional semantic knowledge Rob Shearer
• Re: On the treatment of Design Objectives? Dan Connolly
• Re: Subgraph results Yoshio FUKUSHIGE
• UC&R 1.56 Kendall Clark
• Re: RDF for UC&R Kendall Clark
• RE: Subgraph results Seaborne, Andy
• Bookmarkable queries Rob Shearer
• Subgraph results Rob Shearer
• links from use cases to requirements and goals Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Optional triples and may-bind variables Rob Shearer
• Re: On the treatment of Design Objectives? Yoshio Fukushige
• On UC. 2.7 Yoshio Fukushige
• Re: On the treatment of Design Objectives? Dan Connolly
• On the treatment of Design Objectives? Yoshio Fukushige
• Re: Conference call protocols question Dan Connolly
• RE: Conference call protocols question Howard Katz
• Conference call protocols question Farrukh Najmi
• RDF for UC&R Rob Shearer
• RE: UC&R 1.47 (Was: Re: Comments on UseCases v1.46) Seaborne, Andy
• UC&R 1.48 (Was: Re: UC&R 1.47 ) Kendall Clark
• Re: UC&R 1.47 (Was: Re: Comments on UseCases v1.46) Steve Harris
• Re: UC&R 1.47 (Was: Re: Comments on UseCases v1.46) Farrukh Najmi
• UC&R 1.47 (Was: Re: Comments on UseCases v1.46) Kendall Clark
• Comments on UseCases v1.46 Seaborne, Andy
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access WG telcon 11 May Steve Harris
• RE: agenda: RDF Data Access WG telcon 11 May Seaborne, Andy
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access WG telcon 11 May Steve Harris

Monday, 10 May 2004

• Re: not magic, an actual service! Jos De_Roo
• RE: new UC&R draft: 1.40 Seaborne, Andy
• Re: use case: tell me when OWL has been translated to spanish Kendall Clark
• use case: tell me when OWL has been translated to spanish Dan Connolly
• not magic, an actual service! Kendall Clark
• Re: new UC&R draft: 1.40 Kendall Clark
• Re: new UC&R draft: 1.40 Kendall Clark
• Re: new UC&R draft: 1.40 Kendall Clark
• RE: new UC&R draft: 1.40 Dan Connolly
• RE: new UC&R draft: 1.40 Seaborne, Andy
• RE: agenda: RDF Data Access WG telcon 11 May Seaborne, Andy
• new UC&R draft: 1.40 Kendall Clark
• agenda: RDF Data Access WG telcon 11 May Dan Connolly
• RE: Reqirement 3.5: subgraph results Seaborne, Andy

Saturday, 8 May 2004

• Re: Requirement 3.6: Optional Match Kevin Wilkinson

Friday, 7 May 2004

• RE: Minutes of RDF DAWG telcon 2004-05-04 for review Dan Connolly
• RE: Minutes of RDF DAWG telcon 2004-05-04 for review Seaborne, Andy
• RE: requirement: rdfs query (for lack of a better name...) Seaborne, Andy
• RE: requirement: rdfs query (for lack of a better name...) Seaborne, Andy
• Re: requirement: rdfs query (for lack of a better name...) Pat Hayes
• RE: requirement: rdfs query (for lack of a better name...) Jos De_Roo
• Re: Minutes of RDF DAWG telcon 2004-05-04 for review Pat Hayes
• Minutes of RDF DAWG telcon 2004-05-04 for review Rob Shearer
• RE: requirement: rdfs query (for lack of a better name...) Pat Hayes
• Re: requirement: rdfs query (for lack of a better name...) Kendall Clark
• Re: requirement: rdfs query (for lack of a better name...) Kendall Clark
• RE: requirement: rdfs query (for lack of a better name...) Pat Hayes
• Re: requirement: rdfs query (for lack of a better name...) Pat Hayes
• Re: requirement: rdfs query (for lack of a better name...) Pat Hayes
• RE: requirement: rdfs query (for lack of a better name...) Pat Hayes
• RE: requirement: multigraph query Jos De_Roo
• RE: Reqirement 3.5: subgraph results Howard Katz
• Requirement 3.4 Subgraph Results - another attempt. Seaborne, Andy
• RE: Requirement 3.6: Optional Match Seaborne, Andy
• RE: requirement: multigraph query Seaborne, Andy
• Re: Potential Requirement: Predicate support with boolean operators Alberto Reggiori
• RE: Reqirement 3.5: subgraph results Seaborne, Andy
• RE: requirement: multigraph query Seaborne, Andy
• RE: requirement: rdfs query (for lack of a better name...) Jos De_Roo

Thursday, 6 May 2004

• RE: requirement: rdfs query (for lack of a better name...) Rob Shearer
• RE: requirement: rdfs query (for lack of a better name...) Jos De_Roo
• RE: requirement: multigraph query Rob Shearer
• RE: requirement: rdfs query (for lack of a better name...) Rob Shearer
• Re: requirement: multigraph query Farrukh Najmi
• Re: requirement: multigraph query Farrukh Najmi
• Re: requirement: multigraph query Kendall Clark
• Re: requirement: multigraph query Jos De_Roo
• Re: requirement: rdfs query (for lack of a better name...) Kendall Clark
• Re: requirement: rdfs query (for lack of a better name...) Kendall Clark
• Re: requirement: multigraph query Kendall Clark
• Re: requirement: multigraph query Kendall Clark
• Re: requirement: multigraph query Kendall Clark
• Re: requirement: multigraph query Kendall Clark
• Re: Requirement on XSD datatypes Jos De_Roo
• Re: requirement: rdfs query (for lack of a better name...) Steve Harris
• RE: requirement: multigraph query Seaborne, Andy
• Re: requirement: multigraph query Farrukh Najmi
• RE: Requirement 3.6: Optional Match Rob Shearer
• RE: requirement: multigraph query Rob Shearer
• RE: requirement: rdfs query (for lack of a better name...) Seaborne, Andy
• RE: requirement: rdfs query (for lack of a better name...) Seaborne, Andy
• RE: Requirement on XSD datatypes Seaborne, Andy
• RE: requirement: rdfs query (for lack of a better name...) Rob Shearer
• Re: requirement: rdfs query (for lack of a better name...) Steve Harris
• RE: Reqirement 3.5: subgraph results Howard Katz
• requirement: multigraph query Kendall Clark
• requirement: rdfs query (for lack of a better name...) Kendall Clark
• RE: Requirement on XSD datatypes Howard Katz
• RE: Various result forms Howard Katz
• Requirement on XSD datatypes Seaborne, Andy
• Requirement 3.6: Optional Match Seaborne, Andy
• RE: XQuery-style extensibility and filtering Howard Katz
• RE: summary of OWL-QL experiences Seaborne, Andy
• RE: Various result forms Seaborne, Andy
• RE: summary of OWL-QL experiences Seaborne, Andy

Wednesday, 5 May 2004

• Re: Various result forms Pat Hayes
• Re: Reqirement 3.5: subgraph results Steve Harris
• RE: Reqirement 3.5: subgraph results Rob Shearer
• Re: Reqirement 3.5: subgraph results Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Various result forms Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Various result forms Pat Hayes
• Re: another 3.1 variant Pat Hayes
• Re: Requirement 3.1 rewording Pat Hayes
• another 3.1 variant Kendall Clark
• Re: Requirement 3.1 rewording Kendall Clark
• RE: Various result forms Seaborne, Andy
• RE: XQuery-style extensibility and filtering Seaborne, Andy
• Re: Requirement 3.1 rewording Pat Hayes
• Re: Reqirement 3.5: subgraph results Steve Harris
• Re: Various result forms Steve Harris
• RE: Various result forms Seaborne, Andy
• RE: Requirement 3.1 rewording Seaborne, Andy
• Re: Various result forms Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Requirement 3.1 rewording Farrukh Najmi
• Re: Requirement 3.1 rewording Kendall Clark
• Re: Requirement 3.1 rewording Kendall Clark
• Re: Potential Requirement: Predicate support with boolean operato rs Farrukh Najmi
• Various result forms Seaborne, Andy
• RE: Reqirement 3.5: subgraph results Seaborne, Andy
• RE: XQuery-style extensibility and filtering Howard Katz
• UC: BT01 - Intelligence Analysis Use Case Thompson, Bryan B.
• Re: Reqirement 3.5: subgraph results Jos De_Roo
• RE: Reqirement 3.5: subgraph results Seaborne, Andy
• RE: Connection to ebXML registry work Seaborne, Andy
• Requirement 3.1 rewording Seaborne, Andy
• Re: Potential Requirement: Predicate support with boolean operators Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Reqirement 3.5: subgraph results Eric Prud'hommeaux
• summary of OWL-QL experiences Pat Hayes

Tuesday, 4 May 2004

• XQuery-style extensibility and filtering Howard Katz
• Re: Potential Requirement: Predicate support with boolean operators Dan Connolly
• doing more work in writing [was: agenda...] Dan Connolly
• RE: Reqirement 3.5: subgraph results Rob Shearer
• RE: Reqirement 3.5: subgraph results Dan Connolly
• Re: Reqirement 3.5: subgraph results Jos De_Roo
• RE: Reqirement 3.5: subgraph results Rob Shearer
• Potential Requirement: Predicate support with boolean operators Farrukh Najmi
• Re: Reqirement 3.5: subgraph results Dan Connolly
• Reqirement 3.5: subgraph results Rob Shearer
• Re: Connection to ebXML registry work [was: mailing list welcome and introduction] Farrukh Najmi
• Connection to ebXML registry work [was: mailing list welcome and introduction] Dan Connolly
• Re: mailing list welcome and introduction Farrukh Najmi
• Re: Issues addressed in "RDF Query and Rules Framework" Eric Prud'hommeaux
• RE: UC&R draft: 1.31 -- Requirement 4.1 Seaborne, Andy
• Low bandwidth use-case addition Steve Harris
• Re: Requirements and Objectives and levels of functionality? Dan Connolly
• RE: rambling about safety Was: Protocol/query interaction - comp utational cost of a query Seaborne, Andy
• RE: testing disjunction Seaborne, Andy
• UC&R draft: 1.31 -- Requirement 4.1 Jean-François Baget
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access WG telcon 4 May Dirk-Willem van Gulik
• RE: UC&R draft: 1.31 Seaborne, Andy
• RE: UC&R draft: 1.31 (requirements) Seaborne, Andy
• Requirements and Objectives and levels of functionality? Yoshio Fukushige
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access WG telcon 4 May Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Issues addressed in "RDF Query and Rules Framework" Yoshio Fukushige
• URI of Yoshio's homework Yoshio Fukushige

Monday, 3 May 2004

• Re: UC&R draft: 1.31 (requirements) Dan Connolly
• Re: UC&R draft: 1.31 Dan Connolly
• UC&R draft: 1.31 Kendall Clark
• oh, I forgot... Kendall Clark
• RE: rambling about safety Was: Protocol/query interaction - comp utational cost of a query Thompson, Bryan B.
• agenda: RDF Data Access WG telcon 4 May Dan Connolly
• Re: reminder: next telcon Tue, 4 May 14:30Z Alberto Reggiori
• Re: AMS ftf minutes for review; photos? Dirk-Willem van Gulik
• rambling about safety Was: Protocol/query interaction - computational cost of a query Eric Prud'hommeaux

Sunday, 2 May 2004

• Re: AMS ftf minutes for review; photos? Jos De_Roo
• testing disjunction Jos De_Roo

Friday, 30 April 2004

• Re: AMS ftf minutes for review; photos? Dave Beckett
• Re: AMS ftf minutes for review; photos? Alberto Reggiori
• AMS ftf minutes for review; photos? Dan Connolly
• updated UseCases status Dan Connolly
• Re: A Comparison of RDF Query Languages Dan Connolly
• RE: A Comparison of RDF Query Languages Dan Connolly
• Re: A Comparison of RDF Query Languages massimo@w3.org

Thursday, 29 April 2004

• Protocol/query interaction - computational cost of a query Seaborne, Andy
• RE: A Comparison of RDF Query Languages Seaborne, Andy
• RE: A Comparison of RDF Query Languages Damian Steer
• Re: A Comparison of RDF Query Languages Claudio Gutierrez Gallardo

Wednesday, 28 April 2004

• Re: A Comparison of RDF Query Languages Adam Souzis
• RE: A Comparison of RDF Query Languages Stephane Fellah
• Re: A Comparison of RDF Query Languages Adam Souzis
• Re: A Comparison of RDF Query Languages Raphael Volz
• Re: A Comparison of RDF Query Languages Kendall Clark
• Comparison of 6 RDF Query languages Raphael Volz
• RE: reminder: next telcon Tue, 4 May 14:30Z Rob Shearer
• Re: A Comparison of RDF Query Languages Rob Shearer
• reminder: next telcon Tue, 4 May 14:30Z Dan Connolly

Tuesday, 27 April 2004

• correction of Yoshio's e-mail address Yoshio Fukushige
• Re: WebOnt use-case discussion format, FYI Kendall Clark
• RE: WebOnt use-case discussion format, FYI Seaborne, Andy

Monday, 26 April 2004

• WebOnt use-case discussion format, FYI Dan Connolly
• RE: Minutes of Minutes of RDF DAWG telcon 2004-04-15 for review Rob Shearer

Friday, 23 April 2004

• DAWG F2F Presentation Implementing RDQL in Rasqal Dave Beckett
• Howards Preso / leiden 2004 (fwd) Dirk-Willem van Gulik
• DAWG F2F record of draft requirements Dave Beckett
• presentation "RDQL: an implementation experience" Alberto Reggiori
• DAWG telcon and F2F meeting decisions Dave Beckett
• RE: DRAFT of presentation on XPointer and HTTP Range for RDF Quer y Thompson, Bryan B.

Thursday, 22 April 2004

• Results of straw poll and use case sorting from DAWG F2F1 day1 Dave Beckett
• Re: F2F hosting offer Dan Connolly
• DRAFT of presentation on XPointer and HTTP Range for RDF Query Thompson, Bryan B.

Wednesday, 21 April 2004

• Re: telcon info. Dirk-Willem van Gulik
• Re: telcon info. connolly@w3.org
• RE: Minutes of Minutes of RDF DAWG telcon 2004-04-15 for review (as modified by A. Reegiori) Jean-François Baget
• Evening before - meet/dinner in Leiden ? Dirk-Willem van Gulik
• RE: Scribe for Thursday morning, please Seaborne, Andy

Tuesday, 20 April 2004

• Wireless network Dirk-Willem van Gulik
• Re: Minutes of Minutes of RDF DAWG telcon 2004-04-15 for review Alberto Reggiori
• Minutes of Minutes of RDF DAWG telcon 2004-04-15 for review Jean-François Baget
• Re: Scribe for Thursday morning, please Jos De_Roo
• Scribe for Thursday morning, please Dan Connolly
• Re: in Leiden... Dirk-Willem van Gulik

Monday, 19 April 2004

• RE: in Leiden... Howard Katz
• RE: in Leiden... Seaborne, Andy
• Re: Homeless in Leiden... Dirk-Willem van Gulik
• RE: Homeless in Leiden... Howard Katz
• Re: Homeless in Leiden... Dirk-Willem van Gulik
• Re: Homeless in Leiden... Dirk-Willem van Gulik
• Homeless in Leiden... Rob Shearer

Friday, 16 April 2004

• RE: Supplemental XQuery reading list Howard Katz
• Re: use cases document freeze Jos De_Roo
• use cases document freeze Kendall Clark
• RE: Supplemental XQuery reading list Howard Katz
• another F2F hosting offer Rob Shearer
• F2F hosting offer Pat Hayes
• Re: Supplemental XQuery reading list Eric Prud'hommeaux
• RE: Supplemental XQuery reading list Howard Katz
• Re: Supplemental XQuery reading list Eric Prud'hommeaux
• RE: Supplemental XQuery reading list Rob Shearer
• RE: Supplemental XQuery reading list Howard Katz
• RE: Supplemental XQuery reading list Seaborne, Andy
• RE: Supplemental XQuery reading list Howard Katz
• RE: Supplemental XQuery reading list Howard Katz
• RE: Supplemental XQuery reading list Howard Katz
• Re: logistics for Amsterdam Dirk-Willem van Gulik
• Introduction Yoshio Fukushige / Matsushita Electric Industrial Yoshio Fukushige
• Re: Use case: find all the triples which do or do not use a URI from a namespace Patrick Stickler
• Re: Use case: find all the triples which do or do not use a URI from a namespace Steve Harris
• Re: Use case: find all the triples which do or do not use a URI from a namespace Patrick Stickler
• Re: Use case: find all the triples which do or do not use a URI from a namespace Patrick Stickler
• Re: Supplemental XQuery reading list Paul Cotton

Thursday, 15 April 2004

• agenda: RDF Data Access Working Group Meeting, April 2004 Dan Connolly
• RE: Supplemental XQuery reading list Seaborne, Andy
• Use case: find all the triples which do or do not use a URI from a namespace Pat Hayes
• Re: Supplemental XQuery reading list Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Supplemental XQuery reading list Howard Katz
• early departure Howard Katz
• regrets Patrick Stickler

Wednesday, 14 April 2004

• RE: logistics for Amsterdam Howard Katz
• Re: logistics for Amsterdam Dan Connolly
• logistics for Amsterdam Howard Katz
• agenda: 15 Apr RDF Data Access WG teleconference Dan Connolly
• Re: Minutes of RDF DAWG telcon 2004-04-08 for review Dan Connolly
• Re: Minutes of RDF DAWG telcon 2004-04-08 for review Patrick Stickler

Tuesday, 13 April 2004

• Re: Minutes of RDF DAWG telcon 2004-04-08 for review Kendall Clark
• RE: AMS meeting agenda: reading list, presentations Seaborne, Andy
• Re: Minutes of RDF DAWG telcon 2004-04-08 for review Dan Connolly
• Re: Minutes of RDF DAWG telcon 2004-04-08 for review Eric Prud'hommeaux
• disjunction vs. inference Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Minutes of RDF DAWG telcon 2004-04-08 for review Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Minutes of RDF DAWG telcon 2004-04-08 for review Patrick Stickler
• Re: use case dc-02 Patrick Stickler
• Re: Requirement: queries written as RDF Patrick Stickler
• Re: Requirement: queries written as RDF Patrick Stickler
• Re: RDFQ - RDF Queries in RDF Patrick Stickler

Monday, 12 April 2004

• Introduction: Kevin Wilkinson / HP Kevin Wilkinson

Tuesday, 13 April 2004

• how to get to the meeting... Dan Connolly

Monday, 12 April 2004

• RE: use case: finding employees by type (disjunction and OWL) Jos De_Roo
• RE: use case: finding employees by type (disjunction and OWL) Rob Shearer
• RE: use case: finding employees by type (disjunction and OWL) Jos De_Roo
• AMS meeting agenda: reading list, presentations Dan Connolly
• RE: use case: finding employees by type (disjunction and OWL) Rob Shearer
• RE: use case: finding employees by type (disjunction and OWL) Jos De_Roo
• RE: use case: finding employees by type (disjunction and OWL) Rob Shearer
• Re: use case: finding employees by type (disjunction and OWL) Dan Connolly

Sunday, 11 April 2004

• use case: finding employees by type (disjunction and OWL) Rob Shearer
• Re: Minutes of RDF DAWG telcon 2004-04-08 for review Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Use case: chunking Steve Harris
• Use case: bandwidth efficiency Steve Harris

Saturday, 10 April 2004

• Introduction: Steve Harris, University of Southampton Steve Harris
• Re: Minutes of RDF DAWG telcon 2004-04-08 for review Kendall Clark
• Minutes of RDF DAWG telcon 2004-04-08 for review Eric Prud'hommeaux

Friday, 9 April 2004

• RE: typo correction: Re: Requirement: queries written as RDF (supplants my previous post in this thread) Howard Katz
• Re: minutes delayed for 8 Apr RDF Data Access WG teleconference Dan Connolly
• minutes delayed for 8 Apr RDF Data Access WG teleconference Eric Prud'hommeaux

Thursday, 8 April 2004

• typo correction: Re: Requirement: queries written as RDF (supplants my previous post in this thread) Eric Prud'hommeaux
• RE: use case dc-02 Howard Katz
• RE: use case dc-02 Dirk Colaert
• RE: use case dc-02 Howard Katz
• Re: Requirement: queries written as RDF Frank Careccia
• Re: taxonomy for use case requirements Jos De_Roo
• Re: taxonomy for use case requirements Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Requirement: queries written as RDF Eric Prud'hommeaux
• use case dc-02 Dirk Colaert
• RE: RDFQ - RDF Queries in RDF Jean-François Baget
• Re: taxonomy for use case requirements Jos De_Roo
• Charter item 1.5 motivation Howard Katz
• RE: Requirement: queries written as RDF Howard Katz
• RE: agenda: 8 Apr RDF Data Access WG teleconference (fun with people, places, and timezones) Dan Connolly
• RE: Requirement: queries written as RDF Dirk Colaert
• RE: Requirement: queries written as RDF Dirk Colaert
• Re: agenda: 8 Apr RDF Data Access WG teleconference Janne Saarela
• taxonomy for use case requirements Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: RDFQ - RDF Queries in RDF Patrick Stickler
• Re: Requirement: queries written as RDF Patrick Stickler
• Re: RDFQ - RDF Queries in RDF Patrick Stickler
• RE: Requirement: queries written as RDF Howard Katz
• RE: agenda: 8 Apr RDF Data Access WG teleconference (fun with people, places, and timezones) Howard Katz
• Re: face to face registration form Dan Connolly
• RE: agenda: 8 Apr RDF Data Access WG teleconference (fun with people, places, and timezones) Dan Connolly

Wednesday, 7 April 2004

• RE: agenda: 8 Apr RDF Data Access WG teleconference Howard Katz
• Re: agenda: 8 Apr RDF Data Access WG teleconference Kendall Clark
• agenda: 8 Apr RDF Data Access WG teleconference Dan Connolly
• RE: Requirement: queries written as RDF Howard Katz
• Re: Requirement: queries written as RDF Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: RDFQ - RDF Queries in RDF Patrick Stickler
• Re: RDFQ - RDF Queries in RDF Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: RDFQ - RDF Queries in RDF Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: RDFQ - RDF Queries in RDF Patrick Stickler
• Re: RDFQ - RDF Queries in RDF Patrick Stickler
• Re: RDFQ - RDF Queries in RDF Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: toward Apr AMS meeting agenda Alberto Reggiori
• Re: face-to-face meeting proposals? [was: toward Apr AMS meeting agenda] Patrick Stickler

Tuesday, 6 April 2004

• RE: toward Apr AMS meeting agenda Jos De_Roo
• RE: toward Apr AMS meeting agenda Rob Shearer
• face-to-face meeting proposals? [was: toward Apr AMS meeting agenda] Dan Connolly
• Re: toward Apr AMS meeting agenda Dan Connolly
• Use case: RDF data files on a cellphone Rob Shearer
• Use case: RDF configuration files Rob Shearer
• Requirement: protocol independence Rob Shearer
• Re: Requirement: queries written as RDF Patrick Stickler

Monday, 5 April 2004

• RE: Requirement: queries written as RDF Rob Shearer
• Re: Requirement: queries written as RDF Dan Connolly
• Re: a draft DAWG document outline Dan Connolly
• Re: Requirement: queries written as RDF Patrick Stickler
• Re: RDFQ - RDF Queries in RDF Patrick Stickler
• Re: Use Case: DC-01 Patrick Stickler
• Re: PS-8: Query with Datatype Value Comparison & Support for Arbitrary Datatypes in Query Patrick Stickler
• RE: Use Case: DC-01 Dirk Colaert

Sunday, 4 April 2004

• RE: Requirement: queries written as RDF Howard Katz
• Re: Use Case: DC-01 Patrick Stickler

Saturday, 3 April 2004

• RE: PS-8: Query with Datatype Value Comparison & Support for Arbitrary Datatypes in Query Rob Shearer

Friday, 2 April 2004

• RE: Requirement: queries written as RDF Rob Shearer
• Re: RDFQ - RDF Queries in RDF Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: PS-16: Regular Expression Comparison of Datatype Lexical Forms Janne Saarela
• Re: Use Case: DC-01 Dirk Colaert
• Re: Use Case: DC-01 Patrick Stickler
• Re: PS-8: Query with Datatype Value Comparison & Support for Arbitrary Datatypes in Query Patrick Stickler
• Re: Requirement: queries written as RDF Patrick Stickler
• Re: PS-16: Regular Expression Comparison of Datatype Lexical Forms Patrick Stickler
• Re: Requirement: hand-written queries Patrick Stickler
• Re: getting rdf query results as an rdf graph (fwd) Patrick Stickler
• Re: Requirement: queries written as RDF Patrick Stickler
• Re: PS-8: Query with Datatype Value Comparison & Support for Arbitrary Datatypes in Query Janne Saarela
• Re: PS-16: Regular Expression Comparison of Datatype Lexical Forms Janne Saarela
• Re: Requirement: negation Patrick Stickler

Thursday, 1 April 2004

• RDFQ - RDF Queries in RDF Patrick Stickler

Friday, 2 April 2004

• Re: Requirement: queries written as RDF Eric Prud'hommeaux

Thursday, 1 April 2004

• RE: Minutes of RDF DAWG telcon 2004-04-01 for review Dave Beckett
• getting rdf query results as an rdf graph (fwd) Dave Beckett
• Requirement: hand-written queries Rob Shearer
• Requirement: queries written as RDF Rob Shearer
• RE: Minutes of RDF DAWG telcon 2004-04-01 for review Rob Shearer
• Minutes of RDF DAWG telcon 2004-04-01 for review Dave Beckett
• Use Case: Cheapest Flight Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Requirement: negation Rob Shearer
• Re: a draft DAWG document outline Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Versa path query language Kendall Clark
• Re: face to face registration form Dan Connolly
• RE: agenda: 1 Apr RDF Data Access WG teleconference Howard Katz
• Use Case: DC-01 Dirk Colaert
• Re: agenda: 1 Apr RDF Data Access WG teleconference Patrick Stickler
• Re: a draft DAWG document outline Patrick Stickler
• Re: Use case: AFS-2: Patrick Stickler

Last message date: Wednesday, 30 June 2004 22:14:27 UTC