- From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 21:08:46 +0100
- To: <kendall@monkeyfist.com>, <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Kendall, > For the telcon tomorrow, please try to glance at version > 1.40, OK - will do. And thanks fo rpointing out the areas of change. Have there been significant changes to the Use Cases? I'll take a complete look at it tomorrow before the telecon but I did notice that the title to "3.1 Multiple Triple Matching" has got out of step with the text and is not discussed in email. The title in the agenda is "Multiple RDF triple matching" The requirement title might be better as "RDF Graph Matching" to match (sic) the text change to graph patterns as of 0269. "RDF Graph" is a defined term in the RDF concepts. (Well - it shows I've looked at the new draft at least!) Andy -------- Original Message -------- From: public-rdf-dawg-request@w3.org <> Date: 10 May 2004 17:32 Peeps, For the telcon tomorrow, please try to glance at version 1.40, or higher, of http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/UseCases which I have just checked in. Some of the notable changes include rewording several requirements, including some we seem to have reached some consensus about recently. I've also included a more complete Design Objectives section, which includes 6 or 7 requirements that have some support. I've also started working on a set of technical terms for our design space, to be included in an eventual glossary. I don't expect that will necessarily live in the pub'd draft of UC&R, but I'd like to keep them there for now as a reminder to myself and to others, as a way of trying out new terms, and because I don't want to start another doc just yet. :> Best, Kendall Clark PS--I've been having mail troubles lately (that is, I've go entirely too much mail!); thus, if you review 1.40 and don't see something you were expecting to see, the most prudent course of action is to email me directly with your question, comment, or patch.
Received on Monday, 10 May 2004 16:09:10 UTC