RE: Questions concerning 11.7 (Aggregate Example (with errors)) [BT-3]

Steve,

Yes.

Thanks,
Bryan 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steve Harris [mailto:Steve.harris@garlik.com] 
> Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2012 10:31 AM
> To: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
> Cc: Bryan Thompson
> Subject: RE: Questions concerning 11.7 (Aggregate Example 
> (with errors)) [BT-3]
> 
> In response to 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2
> 011Oct/0020.html
> 
> > > The result of an Aggregate which returns an error, is an 
> error, but 
> > > the SELECT expression result of projecting an error is unbound.
> > 
> > Will any such clarification be present in the final version 
> of the document?
> 
> No. We believe that the combination of the spec text, and 
> tests is sufficiently clear as it stands.
> 
> Please indicate whether you feel the response has answered 
> your comment.
> 
> - Steve, on behalf of the SPARQL Working Group.
> 
> --
> Steve Harris, CTO
> Garlik, a part of Experian
> 1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW, UK
> +44 20 8439 8203  http://www.garlik.com/
> Registered in England and Wales 0535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11 
> Registered office: Landmark House, Experian Way, Nottingham, 
> Notts, NG80 1ZZ
> 
>

Received on Tuesday, 6 March 2012 15:33:13 UTC