- From: Chimezie Ogbuji <chimezie@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 22:15:39 -0500
- To: Gregg Reynolds <dev@mobileink.com>
- Cc: Ian Davis <ian.davis@talis.com>, public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
Gregg, On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Gregg Reynolds <dev@mobileink.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Chimezie Ogbuji <chimezie@gmail.com> > FYI the version links on the drafts refer to "http-rdf-update". The "Latest > Version" link on > http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-sparql11-http-rdf-update-20100126/ points to > the October draft (http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-http-rdf-update/). I believe this is as it should be. All the previous drafts should have a latest version link that points to the most recent publication and as a result of the redirect this will always change from one publication to the next. > We also have http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/http-rdf-update/ which has no > Version links. Yes, that is the editor's draft and it has no official standing other than to reflect the state of the specification in between W3C publications for the benefit of the working group discussion. Since, it is the only place where quick changes can be made to address feedback from comments in between publications, I tend to refer commentators to this document. -- Chime
Received on Wednesday, 26 January 2011 03:16:27 UTC