- From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 09:10:23 +0000
- To: Gregg Reynolds <dev@mobileink.com>
- Cc: "Chimezie Ogbuji" <chimezie@gmail.com>, "Ian Davis" <ian.davis@talis.com>, <public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org>
Dear Gregg, just for clarification: The latest working draft is this one: http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-sparql11-http-rdf-update-20101014/ (that link was also corrected on our wiki page) The link http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-http-rdf-update/ always refers to the latest working draft version of the document, i.e. at the moment to http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-sparql11-http-rdf-update-20101014/ The link http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/http-rdf-update/ is the current *Editor's draft* which is a document in flux that will eventually evolve into the next upcoming Working draft version. I was not entirely sure whether your mail was meant as a comment or whether you implied any action for the group, but I hope that clarifies matters, could you briefly acknowledge? Thanks a lot, Axel On 25 Jan 2011, at 22:01, Gregg Reynolds wrote: > On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Chimezie Ogbuji <chimezie@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, Ian. Thanks for your comments, see the response(s) below (in > ... > > FYI the version links on the drafts refer to "http-rdf-update". The "Latest Version" link on http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-sparql11-http-rdf-update-20100126/ points to the October draft (http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-http-rdf-update/). We also have http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/http-rdf-update/ which has no Version links. > > -Gregg
Received on Wednesday, 26 January 2011 09:10:57 UTC