public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org from December 2011 by thread

SPARQL Update: Example 5 Andy Seaborne (Monday, 26 December)

Re: Questions and comments on SPARQL 1.1 Graph Store HTTP Protocol draft Chime Ogbuji (Thursday, 22 December)

Re: Various comments on SPARQL 1.1 Entailment Regimes Birte Glimm (Tuesday, 20 December)

Re: ENCODE_FOR_LOCAL_NAME Axel Polleres (Wednesday, 14 December)

Re: Grammar for PREFIX definitions Axel Polleres (Wednesday, 14 December)

Re: Indirect Graph Identification Kjetil Kjernsmo (Thursday, 8 December)

Re: When is HAVING processed? Birte Glimm (Thursday, 8 December)

Re: Make clear that SPARQL prefixed names are not CURIEs Andy Seaborne (Thursday, 8 December)

SPARQL 1.1 Update: minor inconsistency between text and grammar Jeen Broekstra (Wednesday, 7 December)

SPARQL, PATCH and IE's XMLHttpRequest Object David Wood (Wednesday, 7 December)

Re: Clarification of variable scoping Andy Seaborne (Tuesday, 6 December)

Comments on SPARQL 1.1 Query Language Paul Gearon (Tuesday, 6 December)

"SPARQL 1.1 Overview" comments Bob DuCharme (Monday, 5 December)

Re: Security issue in SPARQL string escaping in SPARQL grammar Paul Gearon (Monday, 5 December)

Re: Fwd: Re: Editorial clarification in Basic Graph Pattern intro David Booth (Monday, 5 December)

Re: SPARQL 1.1 - LeftJoin definition Andy Seaborne (Monday, 5 December)

Re: Editorial clarification in Basic Graph Pattern intro Andy Seaborne (Monday, 5 December)

Re: xsd:hexBinary and xsd:base64Binary entailments Birte Glimm (Saturday, 3 December)

Last message date: Tuesday, 27 December 2011 11:41:17 UTC