public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org from December 2011 by date

Tuesday, 27 December 2011

• Re: SPARQL Update: Example 5 Alexandre Passant

Monday, 26 December 2011

• SPARQL Update: Example 5 Andy Seaborne

Saturday, 24 December 2011

• Re: Questions and comments on SPARQL 1.1 Graph Store HTTP Protocol draft Sandro Hawke
• Re: Questions and comments on SPARQL 1.1 Graph Store HTTP Protocol draft Chime Ogbuji

Thursday, 22 December 2011

• Re: Questions and comments on SPARQL 1.1 Graph Store HTTP Protocol draft Sandro Hawke
• Re: Questions and comments on SPARQL 1.1 Graph Store HTTP Protocol draft Chime Ogbuji

Tuesday, 20 December 2011

• Re: Various comments on SPARQL 1.1 Entailment Regimes Birte Glimm

Wednesday, 14 December 2011

• Re: Grammar for PREFIX definitions David Booth
• Re: ENCODE_FOR_LOCAL_NAME David Booth
• Re: ENCODE_FOR_LOCAL_NAME Axel Polleres
• Re: Grammar for PREFIX definitions Axel Polleres
• Re: "SPARQL 1.1 Overview" comments Axel Polleres

Monday, 12 December 2011

• Re: Indirect Graph Identification Kjetil Kjernsmo
• Re: Indirect Graph Identification Kjetil Kjernsmo

Saturday, 10 December 2011

• Re: Indirect Graph Identification Chime Ogbuji

Friday, 9 December 2011

• Re: Indirect Graph Identification Gregg Reynolds
• Re: Indirect Graph Identification Kjetil Kjernsmo
• Re: Indirect Graph Identification Gregg Reynolds

Thursday, 8 December 2011

• Re: Indirect Graph Identification Kjetil Kjernsmo
• Re: SPARQL 1.1 Update: minor inconsistency between text and grammar Jeen Broekstra
• Re: Make clear that SPARQL prefixed names are not CURIEs Andy Seaborne
• Re: Make clear that SPARQL prefixed names are not CURIEs Richard Cyganiak
• Re: When is HAVING processed? Alex Miller
• Re: xsd:hexBinary and xsd:base64Binary entailments Henry Story
• Re: When is HAVING processed? Birte Glimm
• Re: xsd:hexBinary and xsd:base64Binary entailments Birte Glimm
• Re: Security issue in SPARQL string escaping in SPARQL grammar Steve Harris
• Re: Make clear that SPARQL prefixed names are not CURIEs Andy Seaborne
• Re: SPARQL 1.1 Update: minor inconsistency between text and grammar Andy Seaborne

Wednesday, 7 December 2011

• SPARQL 1.1 Update: minor inconsistency between text and grammar Jeen Broekstra
• SPARQL, PATCH and IE's XMLHttpRequest Object David Wood
• Re: Security issue in SPARQL string escaping in SPARQL grammar Paul Gearon
• Re: SPARQL 1.1 - LeftJoin definition Andy Seaborne

Tuesday, 6 December 2011

• Re: Comments on SPARQL 1.1 Query Language David Booth
• Re: Clarification of variable scoping Andy Seaborne
• Re: xsd:hexBinary and xsd:base64Binary entailments Henry Story
• Re: Security issue in SPARQL string escaping in SPARQL grammar Steve Harris
• Comments on SPARQL 1.1 Query Language Paul Gearon

Monday, 5 December 2011

• Re: Security issue in SPARQL string escaping in SPARQL grammar Richard Cyganiak
• "SPARQL 1.1 Overview" comments Bob DuCharme
• Re: Security issue in SPARQL string escaping in SPARQL grammar Paul Gearon
• Re: SPARQL 1.1 - LeftJoin definition David McNeil
• Re: Fwd: Re: Editorial clarification in Basic Graph Pattern intro David Booth
• Re: SPARQL 1.1 - LeftJoin definition Andy Seaborne
• Re: Editorial clarification in Basic Graph Pattern intro Andy Seaborne

Saturday, 3 December 2011

• Re: xsd:hexBinary and xsd:base64Binary entailments Birte Glimm

Last message date: Tuesday, 27 December 2011 11:41:17 UTC