- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2011 12:17:42 +0000
- To: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
David, Thank you for your suggestions - I have incorporated them into the the editors working draft. Andy On 18/10/11 20:26, David Booth wrote: > Sec 5.1 says: > http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-query/#BasicGraphPatterns > [[ > A sequence of triple patterns interrupted by a filter comprises a single > basic graph pattern. > ]] > The word "interrupted" is ambiguous, as it sometimes means > "terminated" (no continuation) and other times it means "paused" (with > continuation). I suggest rewording the sentence as: > [[ > A sequence of triple patterns, with optional filters, comprises a single > basic graph pattern. > ]] > > That section also says: > [[ > Any graph pattern terminates a basic graph pattern. > ]] > *Any* graph pattern? That doesn't seem to make sense, because a > sequence of triple patterns is a graph pattern. Perhaps that sentence > was supposed to say "Any *other* graph pattern terminates a basic graph > pattern"? > >
Received on Monday, 5 December 2011 12:18:11 UTC