public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org from June 2010 by author

Chimezie Ogbuji

• Re: httpRange-14 as normative reference (and something on ISSUE-49) (Tuesday, 29 June)

Damian Steer

• Brief comment on sd:name (Tuesday, 22 June)

Eric Prud'hommeaux

• Re: wrong example in the Fed.Ext. document (Saturday, 5 June)

Gregory Williams

• Re: Comment re SPARQL 1.1 Service Description (Wednesday, 30 June)

Ivan Mikhailov

• Re: IRI creation and encoding (Friday, 4 June)

Lee Feigenbaum

• Re: possible erratum (Wednesday, 30 June)

Leigh Dodds

• Re: Standardise method for selecting extensions for DESCRIBE (Wednesday, 23 June)
• Re: Comment re SPARQL 1.1 Service Description (Monday, 7 June)

Michael Hausenblas

• Re: Comment re SPARQL 1.1 Service Description (Wednesday, 9 June)
• Comment re SPARQL 1.1 Service Description (Thursday, 3 June)

Olaf Hartig

• Re: wrong example in the Fed.Ext. document (Saturday, 5 June)
• wrong example in the Fed.Ext. document (Friday, 4 June)

Peter Ansell

• Re: Standardise method for selecting extensions for DESCRIBE (Thursday, 24 June)
• Standardise method for selecting extensions for DESCRIBE (Tuesday, 22 June)
• IRI creation and encoding (Friday, 4 June)

Rob Vesse

• Further comments on SPARQL 1.1 Uniform HTTP Protocol (Thursday, 17 June)
• Comment on SPARQL 1.1 Uniform HTTP Protocol (Tuesday, 15 June)

Robby Nevels

• possible erratum (Monday, 28 June)

Toby Inkster

• Re: Comment re SPARQL 1.1 Service Description (Thursday, 3 June)

Last message date: Wednesday, 30 June 2010 20:10:49 UTC