public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org from May 2005 by thread

Inconsistency in test case result files Geoff Chappell (Tuesday, 24 May)

Test cases Geoff Chappell (Tuesday, 24 May)

Is "GET" or "query" the operation? Mark Baker (Tuesday, 17 May)

Re: Comments on SPARQL (editorial) Dan Connolly (Monday, 16 May)

Re: Comments on SPARQL (datatypes, valueTesting) Dan Connolly (Monday, 16 May)

SQI: Related Work to SPARQL Protocol Bernd Simon (Thursday, 12 May)

Re: SPARQL itself represented in RDF instead of DML Dan Connolly (Thursday, 12 May)

Re: User defined operations and PREMISES keyword Dan Connolly (Thursday, 12 May)

Re: LIMIT clause in right place? Dan Connolly (Thursday, 12 May)

Re: CONSTRUCT *, optionals and alternatives Dan Connolly (Thursday, 12 May)

Re: Boolean effective value tests Dan Connolly (Thursday, 12 May)

SPARQL: extracting a subgraph is practically non-trivial, perhaps too hard Nicolas F Rouquette (Thursday, 5 May)

Using SPARQL: predicate dumps/discovery etc conor dowling (Friday, 6 May)

Comments on ORDER BY Richard Cyganiak (Tuesday, 3 May)

[Fwd: Comments on section 11, Testing Values] Seaborne, Andy (Wednesday, 4 May)

[Fwd: Comments on ORDER BY] Seaborne, Andy (Wednesday, 4 May)

Re: [Fwd: : http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAcce​ss/issues#useMentionOp] Eric Prud'hommeaux (Tuesday, 3 May)

comments on ORDER BY / LIMIT / OFFSET Libby Miller (Tuesday, 3 May)

SPARQL grammar review Arjohn Kampman (Monday, 2 May)

Last message date: Thursday, 26 May 2005 11:59:25 UTC