Re: SPARQL itself represented in RDF instead of DML from Kendall Clark on 2005-05-12 (public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org from May 2005)

From: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 11:15:59 -0400
To: Gustavo Frederico <gcsfred@rogers.com>
Cc: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <20050512151559.GI19099@monkeyfist.com>

On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 06:11:22AM -0400, Gustavo Frederico wrote:
> Hi,
>  I have seen the examples in the SPARQL working draft published April the 19th, 2005.
> I can see that the syntax looks like DML statements. Is the group considering representing
> SPARQL itself in XML or even RDF?

Hi Gustavo,

Here's a design the WG is considering:

       http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/sparqlx.rnc

There's also an WXS version:

	http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/sparqlx.xsd

Kendall Clark

Received on Thursday, 12 May 2005 15:16:28 UTC