- From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 09:56:02 +0100
- To: "Geoff Chappell" <geoff@sover.net>
- Cc: <public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org>
Now, please! Andy -------- Original Message -------- > From: Geoff Chappell <mailto:geoff@sover.net> > Date: 25 May 2005 15:14 > > Thanks, Andy, those work better now :-) > > BTW, I have a few differing results with some tests that involve > unbound vars in filters. Would you like me to report my differences now > or things still in flux in that area? > > Best, > > Geoff > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Seaborne, Andy [mailto:andy.seaborne@hp.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2005 8:56 AM > > To: Geoff Chappell > > Cc: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org > > Subject: Re: Test cases > > > > Geoff, > > > > I have fixed the dateTimes and also the manifest problem in your > > other message. > > > > Thanks > > Andy > > > > > > Geoff Chappell wrote: > > > I notice in a few test cases - e.g: > > > > > > sparql-query-example-Testing-Values-0 > > > sparql-query-example-Testing-Values-1 > > > > > > that seemingly invalid dateTimes are used: > > > > > > xsd:dateTime("2005-01-01T00:00Z") > > > > > > (i.e. seconds aren't optional are they?) > > > > > > Is this an error in the test case or does it imply that the > > > xsd:dateTime function is supposed to be liberal in what it accepts? > > > > > > Also, BTW, I think those particular two tests would be clearer if > > > they didn't used bnodes as subjects. > > > > > > - Geoff
Received on Thursday, 26 May 2005 08:56:16 UTC