- From: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 16:01:17 +0100
- To: andy.seaborne@hp.com
- Cc: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
3.1 Matching RDF Literals... Please disregard my comment. What I had in mind was being able to match against the literal string, irrespective of whether it had a language tag. On second thoughts this wouldn't be much practical use (I'd mixed up ?x ?p "cat" with :s :p ?x). Thanks again, Danny. On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 14:12:43 +0000, Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com> wrote: > Danny Ayers wrote: > > Oops, missed a bit: > > > > [[ > > 3.1 Matching RDF Literals > > ...the query processor does not have to have any understand ony of the > > values in the space of the datatype. > > ]] > > Is there a friendlier way of saying "the space of the datatype"? > > > > [[ > > Matching Language Tags > > ]] > > I wonder if it might be useful to allow a wildcard here, along the lines of: > > > > "cat"@* matches "cat" > > and > > "cat"@* matches "cat"@en > > > > Don't follow. "cat"@* has to match one kind of thing. > > Various tests can be done with FILTER: > > Match things with some language tag: > > ?v ... FILTER lang(?v) != "" > > > Andy > > -- http://dannyayers.com
Received on Monday, 21 March 2005 15:01:18 UTC