- From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.com>
- Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2015 13:18:53 -0700
- To: Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be>
- Cc: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>, Gregory Williams <greg@evilfunhouse.com>, RDF Comments <public-rdf-comments@w3.org>
On Sep 3, 2015, at 12:52 PM, Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be> wrote: >> This implies that we should accept Greg’s reasoning on the tests, but perhaps add <http://a/bb/ccc/../> and <http://a/bb/ccc/./> cases to be sure. Right now, there should be no difference between <http://a/bb/ccc/> <http://a/bb/ccc/.>, <http://a/bb/ccc/..>, or <http://a/bb/ccc/d> > > Agree on adding those, but the behavior for <http://a/bb/ccc/../> should be different from <http://a/bb/ccc/..>, right? > Since "the right-most '/' in the base URI" would then be the last one, I would expect > that resolving <g> against <http://a/bb/ccc/../> yields <http://a/bb/g>, > whereas resolving <g> against <http://a/bb/ccc/..> yields <http://a/bb/ccc/g>. > > Can I add the cases like that (and correct the existing ones)? Yes, the point would be to check the effect of the dot segments in base with trailing slash. >> We need to tread lightly, and get broader input across other implementations of different related specs. > > > I knew I didn't start this thread lightly ;-) I'll check my other implementations, but we'd need to check against different implementations of these specs, and be prepared to update those test suites as well before I'd be comfortable releasing such a change. Gregg > Best, > > Ruben
Received on Thursday, 3 September 2015 20:19:24 UTC