- From: Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org>
- Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2015 12:38:00 +0100
- To: public-rdf-comments@w3.org
On 03/09/15 17:57, Gregg Kellogg wrote: > This really calls for the need for longer-term curation of test > suites (and implementation reports) beyond what is frozen when the > specs are finished. An RDF testing CG could create forks of the > various tests, and maintain them indefinitely on GitHub, or some > similar infrastructure. I know that several people of suggested > updating the SPARQL specs to consider the RDF 1.1 data model, as well > as correct other deficiencies. This would need to consider WGs > re-chartering (e.g., SPARQL 1.2) and reclaiming such test suites. It > really needs more consideration by W3C staff. +1 to CG. Andy
Received on Friday, 4 September 2015 11:38:29 UTC