Re: RDF's relative IRI resolution is ambiguous

Hi Greg,

> New issues:
> 
> s212–s214 (should include /ccc/)
> s218 (should include /ccc/)
> s220–s224 (should include /ccc/)
> s226–s230 (should include /bb/ccc/ or /bb/)
> s238–s251 (should include /bb/ccc/ or /bb/)

I agree with all of those. I have updated the gist to correct these mistakes.
The gist should now be 100% correct.

I updated N3.js to not remove dot segments from the IRI,
and now all of the corrected tests pass fine:
https://github.com/RubenVerborgh/N3.js/commit/7536ed1a

In addition, I have added file:// tests to the gist,
after a comment that they are broken on some Java platforms.

@all: please verify to see if you can spot any mistakes.
If not, I will reach out to authors of libraries that yield different results.

Best,

Ruben

Received on Saturday, 5 September 2015 08:29:39 UTC