- From: Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be>
- Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2015 21:52:50 +0200
- To: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
- Cc: Gregory Williams <greg@evilfunhouse.com>, RDF Comments <public-rdf-comments@w3.org>
> This implies that we should accept Greg’s reasoning on the tests, but perhaps add <http://a/bb/ccc/../> and <http://a/bb/ccc/./> cases to be sure. Right now, there should be no difference between <http://a/bb/ccc/> <http://a/bb/ccc/.>, <http://a/bb/ccc/..>, or <http://a/bb/ccc/d> Agree on adding those, but the behavior for <http://a/bb/ccc/../> should be different from <http://a/bb/ccc/..>, right? Since "the right-most '/' in the base URI" would then be the last one, I would expect that resolving <g> against <http://a/bb/ccc/../> yields <http://a/bb/g>, whereas resolving <g> against <http://a/bb/ccc/..> yields <http://a/bb/ccc/g>. Can I add the cases like that (and correct the existing ones)? > We need to tread lightly, and get broader input across other implementations of different related specs. I knew I didn't start this thread lightly ;-) Best, Ruben
Received on Thursday, 3 September 2015 19:53:20 UTC