- From: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 09:29:24 +0100
- To: Boris Villazon-Terrazas <bvillazon@fi.upm.es>
- Cc: ashok.malhotra@oracle.com, Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>, Juan Sequeda <juanfederico@gmail.com>, W3C RDB2RDF <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
> There was a resolution about this yesterday? We did not discuss this but as there were no objections, consider it resolved and please go ahead with it as pointed out below. Cheers, Michael -- Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway Ireland, Europe Tel.: +353 91 495730 WebID: http://sw-app.org/mic.xhtml#i On 20 Jun 2012, at 09:22, Boris Villazon-Terrazas wrote: > hi all > > There was a resolution about this yesterday? > > Boris > > On Jun 18, 2012, at 1:45 AM, ashok malhotra wrote: > >> >> On 6/17/2012 2:56 PM, Boris Villazon-Terrazas wrote: >>> Regarding the empty R2RML TC, it is not compliant with the latest version of the spec. I can remove that TC if everyone's agree. >> Yes, I think that's best. Anyone disagree? >> >> Ashok >> > >
Received on Wednesday, 20 June 2012 08:30:01 UTC