- From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 11:32:29 +0100
- To: Boris Villazón-Terrazas <bvillazon@fi.upm.es>
- Cc: W3C RDB2RDF <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
On 20 Jun 2012, at 09:29, Michael Hausenblas wrote: >> There was a resolution about this yesterday? > > We did not discuss this but as there were no objections, consider it resolved and please go ahead with it as pointed out below. +1 to keeping the spec as is (require one or more rr:TriplesMap instances) and remove the test case. Best, Richard > > Cheers, > Michael > > -- > Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow > DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute > NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway > Ireland, Europe > Tel.: +353 91 495730 > WebID: http://sw-app.org/mic.xhtml#i > > On 20 Jun 2012, at 09:22, Boris Villazon-Terrazas wrote: > >> hi all >> >> There was a resolution about this yesterday? >> >> Boris >> >> On Jun 18, 2012, at 1:45 AM, ashok malhotra wrote: >> >>> >>> On 6/17/2012 2:56 PM, Boris Villazon-Terrazas wrote: >>>> Regarding the empty R2RML TC, it is not compliant with the latest version of the spec. I can remove that TC if everyone's agree. >>> Yes, I think that's best. Anyone disagree? >>> >>> Ashok >>> >> >> > >
Received on Wednesday, 20 June 2012 10:33:02 UTC