Re: Are empty R2RML mappings valid? from Boris Villazon-Terrazas on 2012-06-20 (public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org from June 2012)

From: Boris Villazon-Terrazas <bvillazon@fi.upm.es>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 10:22:35 +0200
To: ashok.malhotra@oracle.com
Cc: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>, Juan Sequeda <juanfederico@gmail.com>, W3C RDB2RDF <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <CA7B3BD5-1A53-4322-B0B5-CC132491F4DF@fi.upm.es>

hi all

There was a resolution about this yesterday?

Boris

On Jun 18, 2012, at 1:45 AM, ashok malhotra wrote:

> 
> On 6/17/2012 2:56 PM, Boris Villazon-Terrazas wrote:
>> Regarding the empty R2RML TC, it is not compliant with the latest version of the spec. I can remove that TC if everyone's agree.
> Yes, I think that's best.  Anyone disagree?
> 
> Ashok
>

Received on Wednesday, 20 June 2012 08:23:03 UTC