Re: Are empty R2RML mappings valid?

On 6/17/2012 2:56 PM, Boris Villazon-Terrazas wrote:
> Regarding the empty R2RML TC, it is not compliant with the latest version of the spec. I can remove that TC if everyone's agree.
Yes, I think that's best.  Anyone disagree?


Received on Sunday, 17 June 2012 23:46:34 UTC