Re: Direct Mapping spec ready to go for CR!

On 3 Feb 2012, at 06:07, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote:
> Hearing no objection, I implemented Richard's proposed adoption of the IRI-safe function per http://www.w3.org/mid/20120201003753.GA8387@w3.org .

You still got the “(a subset of HTML5 form dataset encoding)” bit in there, which strictly speaking I think isn't correct. (We can go to CR with that text in place IMO as it's really minor issue.) Otherwise the change looks good.

> I also added a normative ref to R2RML and adopted much of Richard's SOTD text. (I have never seen <h4/>s in an SOTD, but I think it makes it a lot more readable).

The OWL2 specs do that and I sort of liked it. It certainly helped me to make sense of the SotD boilerplate :-)

Richard



> 
> 
>> Eric?
>> All the best, Ashok
>> 
>> On 2/2/2012 11:05 AM, Richard Cyganiak wrote:
>>> Ashok,
>>> 
>>> We said that I should ping you when the R2RML Editor's Draft is ready to be converted into a CR draft. I consider it ready now. The ED is as always in CVS in the /r2rml/ folder, and The life version is at http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/
>>> 
>>> It still calls itself an Editor's Draft, and has the CVS revision history on the end (with a corresponding item in the ToC); I assume that the chairs/team take care of this in their own copy.
>>> 
>>> All the best,
>>> Richard
>> 
> 
> -- 
> -ericP
>

Received on Friday, 3 February 2012 10:07:59 UTC